Trump Lawyers Prepared To Take Potential Mueller Subpoena To SCOTUS

PARIS, FRANCE - JUNE 30: Former Mayor of New York Rudolph Giuliani during the Conference In Support Of Freedom and Democracy In Iran on June 30, 2018 in Paris, France. The speakers declared their support for the Ira... PARIS, FRANCE - JUNE 30: Former Mayor of New York Rudolph Giuliani during the Conference In Support Of Freedom and Democracy In Iran on June 30, 2018 in Paris, France. The speakers declared their support for the Iranian peoples uprising and the democratic alternative, the National Council of Resistance of Iran and called on the international community to adopt a firm policy against the mullahs regime and stand by the arisen people of Iran. (Photo by Anthony Devlin/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani said Wednesday that the President’s legal team is already preparing a memo to oppose a potential subpoena from special counsel Robert Mueller and would likely take the legal battle to the Supreme Court if necessary, according to the Washington Post.

“We would move to quash the subpoena,” Giuliani told the Post. “And we’re pretty much finished with our memorandum opposing a subpoena. … (We’re ready to) argue it before the Supreme Court if it ever got there.”

Trump’s team has still not heard back from Mueller about a new proposal on the parameters of a potential interview with Mueller, after rejecting the special counsel’s last proposal last week.

Trump’s lawyers are pushing to shield Trump from being cornered into answering questions about obstruction of justice, while Mueller’s team has offered to allow him to answer those kind of questions in writing. The two sides have been negotiating over the scope of a potential presidential interview for months, as Trump publicly vocalizes his willingness to answer Mueller’s questions.    

Latest Livewire
91
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Blah blah blah. I’ll believe it when I see it. What’s your theory, the Preznit is “too busy” for a subpoena? That didn’t work for Clinton. But then Clinton didn’t have a stacked SCOTUS. I’d say well played, but it really isn’t.

  2. There won’t be a subpoena. There will be a Grand Jury declaration that names Trump as an un-indicted co-conspirator. That’s a deferred indictment and starts the clock on his exit from the Presidency.

  3. Avatar for j.dave j.dave says:

    In a related story, they have also decided what Trump will request for his last meal.

  4. Trump publicly vocalizes his willingness to answer Mueller’s questions.

    Actually, no.

  5. Rudy is noise, rather than news.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

85 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for ottercliff Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for tecmage Avatar for benthere Avatar for tsp Avatar for crooks Avatar for warrenzevon Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for rickjones Avatar for j.dave Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for erik_t Avatar for clare Avatar for karlwlewis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: