Tillerson Defends Trump’s Proposed Cuts To State Department Budget

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson smiles as President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 13, 2017. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Thursday went to bat for President Donald Trump, defending the administration’s proposed cuts to the State Department’s budget.

“Clearly the level of spending that the State Department has been undertaking, particularly in this past year, is simply not sustainable,” Tillerson said in Tokyo, according to Reuters. “As time goes by, there will be fewer military conflicts that the U.S. will be directly engaged in.”

Trump’s budget blueprint proposes cutting the State Department’s budget by 28 percent. However, his budget is merely a proposal and Congress will have a large role in shaping government spending. Trump’s proposed spending cuts will likely face an uphill battle in Congress, and several prominent Republicans have already spoken out against major cuts at the State Department.

Tillerson said on Thursday that he’s ready to take on Trump’s “challenge” to slash the budget at the State Department.

“I’m confident that with the input of the men and women of the State Department we are going to construct a way forward that allows us to be much more effective, much more efficient and be able to do a lot with fewer dollars,” Tillerson said, per Reuters.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Tillerson, truncated and translated: As soon as my share of the Rosneft money is washed I’m outta here anyway.

  2. maybe we should just close Foggy Bottom and have Tillerson operate out of Benghazi with the reduced security budget too…

  3. “As time goes by, there will be fewer military conflicts that the U.S. will be directly engaged in.”-- So why increase military spending by 10% or $54 billion? More evidence that because you are CEO of Exxon doesn’t make a person smart.UFB

  4. “As time goes by, there will be fewer military conflicts that the U.S. will be directly engaged in.”

    Um … does Tillerson understand that there is little correlation between military conflicts and the needs of the State Department? Has he even bothered to talk to anyone in the department he’s now leading?

  5. “As time goes by, there will be fewer military conflicts that the U.S. will be directly engaged in.”

    That’s an argument for cutting Military spending, not State Department you borscht gargling Russian plant.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

62 more replies

Participants

Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for ghost Avatar for sysprog Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for yskov Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for quin Avatar for sanni Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for jcblues Avatar for benthere Avatar for pshah Avatar for magicmaker Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for tiowally Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for bashful Avatar for win

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: