GOP Nominee Regrets Phrasing Of ‘Divide And Conquer’ Line But Not Point Behind It

Thom Tillis waves to supporters at a election night rally in Charlotte, N.C., after winning the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate Tuesday, May 6, 2014. Tillis, the Republican establishment’s favored son in... Thom Tillis waves to supporters at a election night rally in Charlotte, N.C., after winning the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate Tuesday, May 6, 2014. Tillis, the Republican establishment’s favored son in North Carolina, won the state’s Senate nomination by running as a proud conservative who’s not terribly different from his tea party and Christian-right opponents. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

North Carolina House Speaker Thom Tillis, fresh off winning the Republican nomination in the race for Sen. Kay Hagan’s (D-NC), said Wednesday he regretted how he phrased his “divide and conquer” remarks in 2011, when he called for pitting poor people who legitimately need government assistance against poor people who made bad life choices.

Just before Tuesday’s primary, new attention fell on video of Tillis saying at a town hall in Asheville, North Carolina, that we have to “find a way to divide and conquer” people who genuinely need government assistance and people who are poor by their own fault.

During an appearance on MSNBC Wednesday Tillis said he could have phrased his remarks better but didn’t walk back what he was trying to say.

“The frustration is we have people abusing the system at the expense of us being able to do more at the expense of those who need the safety net.” Tillis said. “My point was to say we need to make it very clear, government exists to help those who cannot themselves. And those who can need to let us do everything that they possibly can to let us free up those resources so we can do better things for those who desperately need it.”

MSNBC’s Chuck Todd then asked if Tillis regretted using the word “conquer” in making his argument.

“I do,” Tillis said. But Tillis added that he thought North Carolinians agreed with the point of what he was trying to say.

“I believe the citizens of North Carolina agree with it. And Kay Hagan trying to exploit it,” Tillis said. “It’s a part of their strategy memo for November, it’s a classic example of where she [is] trying to shift attention away from her failed record. I think when we have the opportunity to explain that it resonates with the citizens of North Carolina.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for korvu korvu says:

    So he basically wants a Thunderdome for poor people. Such a sweet guy.

  2. Kind of like Obama saying his administration’s response to Benghazi was “less than optimal.”

  3. Time for Hagan to turn Tillis in a Romney who only gives a rats ass about the rich and wants to divide and conquer the poor and do nothing for the middle class.

  4. Benghazi? What does this have to do about Benghazi?

  5. He says we might take care of the babies, but the rest of you can starve. Oh, and you who are on disability we will take care of you until us republicans can figure out a way to dump your ass too.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

42 more replies

Participants

Avatar for Steve Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for slbinva Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for shmoople Avatar for gjdodger Avatar for dave_adams Avatar for DrSquishy Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for wombat Avatar for wargreymon2013 Avatar for adamw Avatar for ajayne Avatar for foolmemore Avatar for dnl Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for jinnj Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for meta

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: