Texas Dem Calls On DOJ To Monitor State’s Gay Marriage Implementation

People celebrate the Supreme Court decision to legalize same-sex marriage, in Austin, Texas on Friday, June 26, 2015. (Shelby Tauber/Austin American-Statesman via AP) AUSTIN CHRONICLE OUT, COMMUNITY IMPACT OUT, INT... People celebrate the Supreme Court decision to legalize same-sex marriage, in Austin, Texas on Friday, June 26, 2015. (Shelby Tauber/Austin American-Statesman via AP) AUSTIN CHRONICLE OUT, COMMUNITY IMPACT OUT, INTERNET AND TV MUST CREDIT PHOTOGRAPHER AND STATESMAN.COM, MAGS OUT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

With the Texas attorney general suggesting local officials with religious objections can opt out of granting gay marriage licenses, a state Democratic lawmaker is calling on the Department of Justice to monitor Texas’ implementation of the Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

“Officials who take an oath to uphold the Constitution should not be able to deny Texans’ constitution rights with the backing of state legal guidance,” state Sen. Rodney Ellis wrote to U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch Monday.

Ellis, a Democrat from Houston, asked the feds to keep an eye on the state’s implementation of the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage decision and to “intervene, if necessary” if gay couples’ civil rights are being violated in the name of religion.

On Sunday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) issued a nonbinding legal opinion that offered religious accommodations to clerks and justices of the peace who objected to same-sex marriage, and said that his office would even help with their defense if legal claims were brought against them.

“I have serious concerns about the far-reaching implications of this blanket protection for officials who may chose to ignore the law based on their personal religious beliefs,” Ellis wrote to Lynch. “Will judges be able to argue that they should not recognize or authorize divorces if it offends their religious sensibilities? Could a judge refuse to send a defendant to the death penalty under his or her belief that ‘thou shalt not kill’ means just that?”

Read the full letter below:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Monitor all the states that have so beautifully shown their anti-American illegal intentions…

  2. Ah, TX AG merely suggests clerks may be covered if they don’t want to issue licences! What a pandering coward. Pretend it’s OK to violate civil rights, but keep enough cover so that it’s the clerks who would be liable for violating civil rights.

    How the hell do RWers put up with this sort of Russian Roulette from their officials?

  3. Avatar for tao tao says:

    Picky point: it’s called a marriage license, not a gay marriage license.

  4. LOL

    They were monitoring the army during Jade Helm. Now they can monitor THIS.

  5. “Will judges be able to argue that they should not recognize or authorize divorces if it offends their religious sensibilities? Could a judge refuse to send a defendant to the death penalty under his or her belief that ‘thou shalt not kill’ means just that?”

    All of these are excellent questions. Also with the DOJ involved, instead of waiting for someone to file a civil lawsuit forcing implementation of the law, the DOJ can just bring up these fucks on federal charges for obstructing justice involving a Constitutional right, which obviously is being denied. Civil suits can follow for pain and suffering, since a couple’s constitutional rights are being violated. Play nice, follow the law, or pay up mightily by way of legal fines imposed by the Justice Department. That’s what I’d like to see happen should Texass persist in this buffoonery.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

10 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jw1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for charliee Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for attilatheblond Avatar for mantan Avatar for joelopines Avatar for tao Avatar for darrtown

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: