Supreme Court Blocks Early Voting In Ohio

FILE - This Oct. 8, 2010 file photo shows the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court at the Supreme Court in Washington. Seated from left are Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, and Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John Rob... FILE - This Oct. 8, 2010 file photo shows the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court at the Supreme Court in Washington. Seated from left are Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, and Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Standing, from left are Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito Jr., and Elena Kagan. The Supreme Court on Thursday, June 28, 2012, upheld the individual insurance requirement at the heart of President Barack Obama's historic health care overhaul. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court said early voting cutbacks in Ohio can go into effect on Monday, reversing an order by a federal judge to block the state’s restrictive voting law.

The Court’s decision came within one day of when Ohioans would have been able to head to the polls to cast their ballots in the 2014 midterm elections.

The Supreme Court’s decision to reverse the injunction — which was upheld by an appeals court last week — was divided 5-4 along ideological lines. The request was submitted to Justice Elena Kagan, who turned the matter to the full court.

The next step is for the lower courts to consider whether the Ohio law is valid on the merits.

Read the Court’s order, via SCOTUSblog.

Latest Livewire
90
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for chammy chammy says:

    How fucking obvious can a court be?

  2. Avatar for mames5 mames5 says:

    I thought Kennedy was supposed to be the “swing vote.” Is the swing stuck?

  3. As obvious as they want to be until we stop them. Every election at every level is always important in order to get a fair-minded, competent judiciary at every level. At a minimum, Democrats must retain control of the Senate after November.

  4. The conservatives on the Court have given up all pretense of being fair or disinterested.

    And they wonder why Americans see them as highly partisan.

    What a bunch of jackasses.

  5. From SCOTUSblog:

    Monday’s order had the support of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas.

    Of course. But there’s more to the story here. In fact, Sahil has butchered this one quite badly. Also from SCOTUSblog:

    By a vote of five to four, the Justices put on hold a federal judge’s order providing new opportunities for voting before election day, beyond what state leaders wanted.
    The order will remain in effect until the Court acts on an appeal by state officials. If that is denied, then the order lapses. It is unclear when that scenario will unfold. The state’s petition has not yet been filed formally.

    In other words the court did not “reverse the injunction.” They’ve put it on hold temporarily. Granted, it has the practical effect of reversing the decision, since early voting was scheduled to start tomorrow.

    Edit:
    Here’s the SCOTUSblog link since TPM messed it up in the article.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

84 more replies

Participants

Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for pac Avatar for meri Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for leftflank Avatar for scottnatlanta Avatar for sojourner44 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for ottnott Avatar for 1nancy2 Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for ghamiltonsq Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for Izzie Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for whateverdude

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: