GOP Rep: It’s ‘Class Warfare’ To Keep Top Tax Rate For Million-Dollar Earners

UNITED STATES - MARCH 18: Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla., participates in the House Armed Services Committee hearing on "The President's Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against ISIL and the FY2016 N... UNITED STATES - MARCH 18: Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla., participates in the House Armed Services Committee hearing on "The President's Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against ISIL and the FY2016 National Defense Authorization Budget Request from the Department of Defense" on Wednesday, March 18, 2015. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Steve Russell (R-OK) said Monday that maintaining the top marginal tax rate for Americans earning $1,000,000 or more yearly would be “class warfare.”

In an interview, CNN “New Day” co-host John Berman asked Russell about a report from Axios, which did not cite its sources, that Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee were considering cutting the top marginal rate for individuals earning between $418,000 and $999,999, but keeping the existing rate for those earning more than that.

“I don’t think we ought to continue to divide our country into class warfare,” Russell said of the proposal. “One of the sad things since leaving the military and coming to Congress is to see how we have divided our nation on almost every level: socioeconomic, gender, race, and now we’re going to divide on class and divide on wealth? When is it that we unite on things that we actually could agree on?”

Co-host Poppy Harlow pressed: “How is it class warfare to ask whether or not Americans making over $1 million a year, who now pay nearly 40 percent in income tax, should continue to pay that?” she asked. “How is that class warfare in any way? You’re an elected representative who will have to vote on this thing, so? Which way would you go?”

Currently, the top marginal tax rate is only applied to income above $418,400 yearly. Below that level, every American’s income is taxed at lower and lower rates.

Russell said he wasn’t a millionaire; “having been a soldier most of my life, I never accumulated that kind of wealth.”

But the congressman said wealthy people — “or even small businesses or farms or ranches that might create that sort of wealth” — end up paying “an inordinate amount of taxes that people never see when you add excise taxes, corporate taxes, add individual income.”

The White House’s preferred tax proposal would slash corporate tax rates, as well as a slate of other taxes, many of which disproportionately affect the wealthy. President Donald Trump has said he would not personally benefit from his tax proposal; though it’s impossible to know without Trump’s current tax records, what is known about Trump’s finances suggests he and his family would benefit handsomely from the plan.

“It’s easy to throw rocks at somebody simply because they have money,” Russell continued Monday. “And that’s what I’m trying to address. We don’t need to create this class warfare of, ‘You have, and I don’t, therefore I’m going to punish you, and use the government as the punishment tool.’ We’re better as a country than that. And we want a country that creates innovation and creates hope, so that somebody growing up in poverty can be successful, could be wealthy, if they invent an idea and they take it all the way to success.”

“Why do we have to continue to divide our country along these lines?” he asked in conclusion. “It’s a mystery to me.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Shorter GOP: we need to get a tax cut for our donors and the Trump family. We will say anything, however stupid, to do it.

  2. And we want a country that creates innovation and creates hope, so that somebody growing up in poverty can be successful, could be wealthy, if they invent an idea and they take it all the way to success.”

    Actually, we HAD a country like that for the middle part of the 20th C. Taxes on the wealthy were even higher than they are now. The word this dummy is looking for is “opportunity” and it’s pretty much gone now, replaced with an oligarchy and robber barons of the 21st C.

  3. Avatar for jeater jeater says:

    And it’s not class warfare to say that I have healthcare and you don’t?

  4. “How is it class warfare to ask whether or not Americans making over $1 million a year, who now pay nearly 40 percent in income tax, should continue to pay that?”

    Jesus F*CKING christ. This is what passes for “journalism” at CNN these days? “Poppy” failing to understand the concept of marginal tax rates, and passing along her intellectual failings to millions of viewers?

    The average tax rate for millionaires is around 20-25% blended. CAN WE PLEASE GET SOMEONE ON TV WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS?

    No.

  5. Very stupid to contemplate such a position, even more stupid to utter it. The Stupid Party rolls on. Is raising the lowest rate from 10% to 12% also class warfare, Mr. Russell?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

141 more replies

Participants

Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for scottsa Avatar for wanderer Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for lastroth Avatar for cd Avatar for ottnott Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for floydmaster Avatar for junebug Avatar for tsp Avatar for rickjones Avatar for jquas2sunset Avatar for snafubar Avatar for outsidertrading618

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: