House GOPer: Prisoner Exchange For Bergdahl ‘Dangerous’

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., right, accompanied by the committee's ranking member Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Md., inform reporters about proposed changes to the National Secu... House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., right, accompanied by the committee's ranking member Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Md., inform reporters about proposed changes to the National Security Agency’s program of sweeping up and storing vast amounts of data on Americans' phone calls, Tuesday, March 25, 2014, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Details of the government's secret phone records collection program were disclosed last year by former NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden. Privacy advocates were outraged to learn that the government was holding onto phone records of innocent Americans for up to five years. Obama promised to make changes to the program in an effort to win back public support. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) on Sunday warned that the U.S. decision to negotiate for the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl could give Al Qaeda the wrong idea that the U.S. is willing to negotiate with them for hostages.

“So many of us are concerned about what really is a break with U.S. policy of not negotiating with terrorists,” he said on CNN’s State of the Union, according to The Hill.

“We have now set a price,” Rogers continued. “If you negotiate here, you’ve sent a message to every Al Qaeda group in the world – by the way, some who are holding U.S. hostages today – that there is some value now in that hostage in a way that they didn’t have before. That is dangerous.”

Rogers said that “the No. 1 way Al Qaeda raises money” is by kidnapping.

National security adviser Susan Rice told CNN’s Candy Crowley that she wouldn’t characterize Bergdahl’s release as negotiating with terrorists.

“When we are in battles with terrorists, and the terrorists take an American prisoner, that prisoner is still a U.S. serviceman or woman. We still have a sacred obligation to bring that person back,” Rice said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for mymy mymy says:

    So, Mr. Rogers: how much money did we give the Taliban?

    In Afghanistan, the Taliban often terrorizes, but it terrorizes mainly Afghanis, no? and haven’t we actually been trying to bring the Taliban to the table for peace negotiations and reconciliation with the Afghan government?

    The GOP is ridiculous, and the press is their patsy.

  2. “If you negotiate here, you’ve sent a message to every Al Qaeda group in
    the world – by the way, some who are holding U.S. hostages today – that
    there is some value now in that hostage in a way that they didn’t have
    before. That is dangerous.”

    This is in opposition to the GOP - who do not believe that U.S. hostages have any value WHATSOEVER.

    Unless they have POLITICAL value.

  3. It would be a shame though if one of these guys ends up doing us harm, it will just give the right reason to bitch about Obama even more.

  4. Wait…I thought Mr Rogers was a PBS kids show.

  5. Actually, Mr Rogers the policy is not negotiating with terrorists. We didn’t. That’s why the Qataris were the go between ya dolt.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

70 more replies

Participants

Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for doninsd Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for baronsieggy Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for grindelwald Avatar for Darksnark Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for zoran Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for lamonth Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for iheardthisbefore Avatar for geoguy Avatar for darcy Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for boyoboy Avatar for bill_ellis Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for oldlib127 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for occamsrazor2

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: