Crowley Grills Susan Rice On Prisoner Swap: ‘Did The US Negotiate With Terrorists?’ (VIDEO)

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

CNN’s Candy Crowley put national security adviser Susan Rice on defense on Sunday over the U.S. negotiation for the release of Bowe Bergdahl, who was freed from the Taliban as a prisoner of war in Afghanistan on Saturday.

In exchange for the Bergdahl’s release, the U.S. authorized the release of five Guatanamo detainees, which has some Republican lawmakers questioning the administration’s decision to negotiate for Bergdahl’s release.

Crowley quizzed Rice on “State of the Union” about whether the U.S. negotiated with terrorists.

“Point blank, did the U.S. negotiate with terrorists for his release?” Crowley asked.

“Candy, what we did was ensure that, as always, the United States doesn’t leave a man or a woman on the battlefield,” Rice responded. “And in order to do this — it’s very important for folks to understand — if we got into a situation where we said, ‘Because of who has captured an American soldier on the battlefield, we will leave that person behind,’ we would be in a whole new era for the safety of our personnel and for the nature of our commitment to our men and women in uniform.”

Crowley continued to press Rice.

“I think the question now is, and you point to the kinds of warfare we’re having now, but no longer can it be said that the U.S. doesn’t negotiate with terrorists,” Crowley said.

Yet Rice insisted that the U.S. was presented with a new kind of situation with a prisoner of war.

“I wouldn’t put it that way, Candy. I wouldn’t say that at all,” Rice said about Crowley’s characterization that the U.S. negotiated with terrorists. “When we are in battles with terrorists, and the terrorists take an American prisoner, that prisoner is still a U.S. serviceman or woman. We still have a sacred obligation to bring that person back.”

Watch the video via CNN:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. It’s Sunday morning deja vu all over again.

  2. Thanks for giving Darrell Issa MORE ideas, Candy!

    PS You’re not blonde enough, skinny enough, or stupid enough to get a gig on FoxSpews, so give it a rest!

  3. For Pete’s sake, could we get over this label “terrorist”? Throughout the history of civilization wars have involved negotiations. We could easily label any enemy a “terrorist.” Are we then unable to negotiate with anyone at any time? Candy is an idiot for perpetuating this meme.

    Leave it to the media (and the GOP) to turn a success, like bringing home the only captured American, into a failure.

  4. Heartless. I dare you to interview his parents and express that same point of view, Candy.

  5. Avatar for msny msny says:

    ADDED RICE: “Well, let me put it this way, Candy. Since when do we NOT negotiate with terrorists? We simply followed the precedent set by the great patriotic republican Ronald Reagan, who negotiated with terrorists and gave them weapons to secure the release of an American…except for the part of us giving them weapons.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

95 more replies

Participants

Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for CuriousOne Avatar for marby Avatar for yvonneo Avatar for maxie Avatar for grindelwald Avatar for tcinla Avatar for sdcga161 Avatar for msny Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for labman57 Avatar for lamonth Avatar for blueberrytomatosoup Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for gr Avatar for darcy Avatar for SargePhelps Avatar for lorelei23 Avatar for williamv Avatar for eastwest49 Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for upstateny13027

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: