Company That Built Failed O-Care Exchange Sues Oregon, Crying ‘Slander’

Dr. Bruce Goldberg, acting head of Oregon's troubled health insurance exchange, prepares for a news conference on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Cover Oregon's headquarters in Durham, Ore. Goldberg told reporters that th... Dr. Bruce Goldberg, acting head of Oregon's troubled health insurance exchange, prepares for a news conference on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Cover Oregon's headquarters in Durham, Ore. Goldberg told reporters that thousands of Oregonians who sent in their applications by the deadline may have to go elsewhere for temporary coverage in January. (AP Photo/Gosia Wozniacka) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The company behind Oregon’s failed Obamacare exchange sued the state on Friday for breach of contract and also accused state officials of “constant public slander” in their criticism of the website’s performance.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Oracle, a software developer based out of California, filed the lawsuit in U.S. district court. Oregon decided earlier this year to scrap its exchange and switch to the federal HealthCare.gov after a disastrous performance during Obamacare’s first open enrollment period, during which the site had a pitiful 44 sign-ups in its first two months and consumers eventually defaulted to paper applications.

“While flogging Oracle publicly, Cover Oregon continued privately to ask for Oracle’s help. (Indeed it continues to this day to seek Oracle’s technical help with the project),” Oracle wrote in the lawsuit. “Oracle gave that help for many months, in spite of the public excoriation, because it was committed to helping Cover Oregon complete the project and because Cover Oregon repeatedly promised to pay Oracle for its services.”

“In the end, though, Cover Oregon reneged on its promises, thus prompting this lawsuit.”

Oracle received $130 million for its work on Oregon’s exchange, according to the Times. Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber (D) has said he plans to take legal action of his own over the site’s poor performance.

Oracle said in the complaint that Kitzhaber “set out to systematically to vilify the company in the media,” but that the company continued to do work for the state until the contract was terminated.

“Oracle, believing that the best solution for Oregonians was to focus on completing the project, continued to work, quietly and without public retort, in spite of the constant public slander,” the company wrote.

Cover Oregon Lawsuit

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Yeah, I am sure that is really going to help them out with future business.

    I mean, doesn’t everyone want to do business with a contractor that completely fails in the project and then turns around and sues you for daring to point out their failures?

  2. Avatar for mcbain mcbain says:

    Ripping on a company that spent $130M to build a horrible web site is not slander, it is a public service to prevent them from ripping off someone else in the future.

    I can’t believe it was Oracle that built this fiasco. From the headline, I figured it was some random company.

  3. Avatar for norma norma says:

    A mega-corporation creates a product that never works and then sues Oregonians to pay for it. This is a perfect example of 1% entitlement thinking.

  4. Avatar for fitley fitley says:

    If all companies that fail to deliver working products sued there would be quite a backlog. Most companies that fail STFU.

  5. Deflection will not save you. You effed up, take your medicine.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for clk Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for paulw Avatar for sooner Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for mcbain Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for norma Avatar for radgal70 Avatar for fitley Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for cjbinks Avatar for virginialady

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: