McConnell: No Need For Special Committee To Probe Russian Hacking

FILE - In this May 24, 2016 file photo, Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell of Ky. speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Barack Obama is condescending. Senate Minority Leade... FILE - In this May 24, 2016 file photo, Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell of Ky. speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Barack Obama is condescending. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid veers from friendly in private to nasty before TV cameras. Those portrayals come from a new book by McConnell. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said Monday that the Senate Intelligence Committee was capable of investigating Russian hacking intended to influence the U.S. presidential election, saying he wanted to follow “the regular order” of congressional review rather than convene a special committee.

Reading from a prepared statement at a press conference on Capitol Hill, McConnell told reporters that “this simply cannot be a partisan issue.”

“Let me remind all of you that the Senate Intelligence Committee on which I and the chairman sit as ex-officio members, and Sen. Schumer will join us on the committee,” he continued. “And he can review this matter through the regular order. I have every confidence in Chairman [Richard] Burr that he’ll review it in a responsible way.”

McConnell noted that the Obama administration is also launching a review into hacking of the Democratic and Republican National Committees, and that Senate Armed Services Committee Chair John McCain (R-AZ) said he would conduct a review on the threat the U.S. faces from cyberattacks.

Yet he stopped short of expressing support for a call from a bipartisan group of senators, including McCain, Schumer, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), to launch a select committee to investigate Russia’s interference in the election.

“We’re going to follow the regular order,” McConnell repeated. “It’s an important subject and we intend to review it on a bipartisan basis.”

Schumer thanked McConnell for supporting a “deep and thorough bipartisan investigation” in a Monday statement.

“This issue should not and must not turn into a political football,” he wrote. “It’s absolutely essential that this investigation be bipartisan, wide-ranging, and have access to all of the relevant intelligence so that we can find out how this happened, and how we can stop it from happening ever again.”

During his press conference, the Senate Majority Leader also broke from President-elect Donald Trump and his aides to express “the highest confidence” in U.S. intelligence agencies and insist that the “Russians are not our friends.”

Trump claimed this weekend that the FBI and CIA don’t “know” for certain the extent to which the Kremlin attempted to disrupt the election, and on Monday implied that Democrats were playing the “Russia/CIA card” to undermine the results. He has repeatedly said it would be “nice” if the U.S. had warmer relations with Russia and has surrounded himself with advisors and cabinet nominees who have close ties to Vladimir Putin’s government.

McConnell declined to comment on Trump’s views on Russia, instead saying, “I think we ought to approach all of these issues on the assumption that the Russians do not wish us well.”

“I hope that those who were going to be in a position of responsibility in the new administration share my view,” he added.

Latest Livewire
114
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. McConnell is a danger to this country. It’s high time for Republicans, and more than just McCain and Graham, to publicly challenge McConnell and to not just ask, but initiate through whatever means necessary, immediate and multiple investigations into the Russian hacking. When multiple intelligence agencies say it’s happened, when we have public evidence that it’s happened (wikileaks) and when it involves the fundamental nature of our Democracy, it’s not something to be taken lightly. It’s deadly serious and if McConnell won’t put up, someone needs to shut him up.

  2. “I think we ought to approach all of these issues on the assumption that the Russians do not wish us well.”

    It’s a measure of where we are that I find myself surprised to see the Republican Senate leader still willing to express a small degree of wariness about the Russian government.

  3. Trump says:

    “Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!”

    Is “we” the republican party? If so, when did Graham and McCain become Democrats? (and wouldn’t that be nice)

  4. Well that’s it then.
    Now you know for sure the Russians and Wikileaks have some really incriminating shit on McConnell and the Republicans.
    Play dumb or we release it blackmail

    Nothing to see here …move along

    Democracy , It was a nice experiment while it lasted

  5. Mitch is afraid it would tie up the hearing room when it’s needed for more Benghazi hearings.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

108 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for marby Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for winstonsmith Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for inversion Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for tena Avatar for beattycat Avatar for menocchio Avatar for joriep Avatar for j_from_texas Avatar for birdford Avatar for erratum Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for sjmcmahon Avatar for aiddon

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: