LePage Loses Battle To Call Medicaid Expansion ‘Welfare’ On November Ballot

**OTK**In this Wednesday, Jan. 19, 2011 photo, Gov. Paul LePage reacts during a news conference at the State House in Augusta, Maine..  (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)
**OTK**In this Wednesday, Jan. 19, 2011 photo, Gov. Paul LePage reacts during a news conference at the State House in Augusta, Maine.. (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A campaign by Maine’s firebrand Gov. Paul LePage (R) to make sure Medicaid is labeled “welfare” in a ballot initiative this November to expand it to tens of thousands low-income residents has come to a screeching halt, with Secretary of State Matt Dunlap (D) unveiling a much more neutral wording.

When Mainers go to the polls this fall, they will see the following question:

“Do you want Maine to expand Medicaid to provide healthcare coverage for qualified adults under age 65 with incomes at or below 138% of the federal poverty level, which in 2017 means $16,643 for a single person and $22,412 for a family of two?”

David Farmer, the communications director of Mainers for Health Care, which is campaigning in favor of the Medicaid expansion, told TPM he was satisfied with the word choice.

“We believe that Sec. Dunlap has done a good job crafting a fair and accurate question that meets the requirements in Maine law,” he said.

LePage, who has vetoed five bills from the Maine legislature that would have expanded Medicaid under Obamacare, told several conservative talk radio shows that he will sue the Secretary of State if Medicaid expansion is not called either “welfare” or an “entitlement” on the ballot.

Governor LePage’s office did not immediately respond to TPM’s request for comment about whether he will follow through on this threat.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. JFC at a clambake, hasn’t LePage got real issues to address?

  2. Avatar for sanni sanni says:

    Why is this SO big of an issue to LePage that he would threaten to sue the Sec. of State over the wording? All about use of rw “threat” words - aka racist dog whistles. Dog whistles that go away when it is worded clearly.

    All bluster and no winning ideas. Slink back into oblivion with the end of your term, sir. You won’t be missed.

  3. More Winning! I can’t stand so much WIN!

  4. I like it when LePage is humiliated…

  5. LePage Loses Battle of Wits, may affect Important Voting Bloc:

    (WaPo)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

28 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for druid800 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for krusher Avatar for losamigos Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for arrendis Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for breakingdeadmen Avatar for sanni Avatar for ottnott Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for pshah Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for edys Avatar for tindalos Avatar for drtv Avatar for outsidertrading618 Avatar for pwmesq

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: