Huckabee Wants Legal Fund To Pay For Unauthorized Use Of ‘Eye Of The Tiger’

Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, left, at her side, speaks after being released from the Carter County Detention Center, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2015, in Grayson, Ky. Davi... Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, left, at her side, speaks after being released from the Carter County Detention Center, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2015, in Grayson, Ky. Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples, was released Tuesday after five days behind bars. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley) MORE LESS

This post has been updated.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) was sued in November for playing Survivor’s “Eye of the Tiger” at a rally, and now the former presidential candidate wants to set up a legal defense fund to help pay for the settlement of lawsuit.

Rude Music, a record company run by Survivor member Frank M. Sullivan III, sued Huckabee for copyright infringement after the Republican played the song at a rally supporting Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples.

A memo from staff at the Federal Election Commission shows that a lawyer for Huckabee’s presidential campaign in May requested permission to establish a legal fund to pay for attorney fees and part of the settlement in the lawsuit over “Eye of the Tiger.”

FEC attorneys have drafted two possible opinions for the commission. The first would allow the campaign to set up the legal defense fund. The second draft opinion would not let the Huckabee campaign to establish a legal defense fund and could eliminate the ability for future campaigns to establish legal defense funds. It’s not clear what the FEC will ultimately decide. The commission could also allow the Huckabee campaign to establish a legal defense fund for attorneys fees, but not permit the campaign to use the fund to help pay the settlement in the case.

Correction: This article originally stated that FEC attorneys wrote an opinion rejecting the Huckabee campaign’s request, however attorneys have drafted two opinions.

H/t Ken Vogel

60
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “may not be used as described”

    OMG, the Duggar small print…

  2. Oh, Lordy. It’s Stupid and I’m with Stupid…just not sure which one is which…

  3. This electoral season has turned into a master class on political grifting.

  4. Avatar for marby marby says:

    Huckabee is a taker! (in the words of the party of personal responsibility)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

54 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bp Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for genomeman Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for humpback Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for kunda311 Avatar for sandyh Avatar for inversion Avatar for mantan Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for tomj Avatar for dickweed Avatar for pine Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for dnl Avatar for ennuithereyet Avatar for edhedh Avatar for pejesq Avatar for jsrtheta Avatar for hahagoodman

Continue Discussion