House Chair: Obamacare Subsidies Must Continue To Avoid Collapse Amid Repeal

UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 17: Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., speaks with reporters after a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the Capitol, November 17, 2016. Vice President-elect Mike Pence spoke at the meeting.... UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 17: Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., speaks with reporters after a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the Capitol, November 17, 2016. Vice President-elect Mike Pence spoke at the meeting. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A key House Republican in the effort to repeal Obamacare said that the law’s subsidies for insurers which are currently the target of a GOP lawsuit will continue in the so-called transition period after the Affordable Care Act of is repealed. The acknowledgement that the subsidies will need to be maintained is yet another signal that key Republicans on the Hill are prepared to prop up Obamacare in the short term while they work on an eventual replacement plan

House Energy and Commerce Chairman Greg Walden (R-OR), who heads one of the committees that will be writing the legislation to repeal Obamacare, told Politico last week that he wants to see the subsidy program funded “one way or another.”

“If you don’t, the plans have the ability to cancel midyear, and we said we wouldn’t pull the rug out from under people — and we shouldn’t,” he said, according to the report published Friday evening.

The subsidies are known as a cost-sharing reduction payments, and they help insurers keep out-of-pocket costs down for low-income consumers, as is required by the Affordable Care Act. House Republicans sued the Obama administration in 2014 for using Treasury Department funds to make the payments, as they had not been appropriated by Congress. A federal judge last May ruled in favor of the Republicans, but after the case was appealed, its proceedings were paused until after President-elect Donald Trump is inaugurated.

“We’re working through the mechanics on it because we also want to preserve the court victory,” Walden told Politico. “Regardless of who is in power, if you get to the point where a president can spend whatever he or she wants without any check and balance from the Congress, you don’t have these branches anymore.”

The subsidies were among a number of measures in the Affordable Care Act that Republicans decried as “insurer bailouts” under the Obama administration. Health policy experts predict major chaos in the individual market, if not an outright collapse, if the cost-sharing reduction payments were abruptly stopped. As TPM previously reported, some Republicans have acknowledged that they would need to maintain measures they opposed in the past to stabilize the insurance market while they dismantle the Affordable Care Act.

Notably, Senate HELP Chair Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who heads one of the committees writing the repeal legislation on the Senate side, said in a floor speech last week that the cost-sharing payments should be continued on a temporary basis.

“We may have to agree to do somethings for a two- to three-year period that we normally wouldn’t do in the long-term to make sure we give people the relief,” Alexander told TPM before the holiday break.

According to the Politico report, other Republicans are conceding that they will have to appropriate the money to maintain the payments, but it’s unclear exactly how or when they plan to do so. Nor is it certain that they have consensus on the issue.

“You can’t [fund the program] unless you’re going to increase the allocation to the committee,” Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK), chairman of the House Labor and Health and Human Services appropriations subcommittee, told Politico.

“I don’t know that we’re particularly obligated to pay for the mistakes that the Obama administration made that violated the law,” he said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Oh Congresscreep Snowflake, you don’t want any consequences at the midterms! And we all know, once you subsidize something,the subsidy is forever.

  2. Hapless fools/killers.

  3. More evidence that we have been witnessing a six year Congressional tantrum. Sound and fury, signifying nothing in the end.

    I hope.

  4. The GOP needs to, among other things, avoid job losses. Estimates I’ve seen run as high as 3 million positions if ACA is axed without a replacement. That would raise the national unemployment rate to about 6.6pct from the current 4.7pct. Just in time for 2018. Ouch!

  5. The subsidies you fought to eliminate while President Blackenstein was in office? The ones you said were fiscally irresponsible and a handout? Those subsidies?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for shoreline_jim Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for sysprog Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for trnc Avatar for lastroth Avatar for zrx1100 Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for smarish Avatar for sherrybb Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for jonnygee Avatar for cardinalfang Avatar for greysea Avatar for badabingo Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for win Avatar for orwell2017 Avatar for saygoodnightgracie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: