Gowdy Floats Theory That Dems Set Trump Up To Redact Parts Of Their Memo

WASHINGTON, D.C. - MARCH 20: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speaks a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing concerning Russian meddling in the 2016 United States election, on Capitol Hill, March 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. While both the Senate and House Intelligence committees have received private intelligence briefings in recent months, Monday's hearing is the first public hearing on alleged Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 election. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, D.C. - MARCH 20: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speaks a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing concerning Russian meddling in the 2016 United States election, on Capitol Hill, March 20, 2017 in... WASHINGTON, D.C. - MARCH 20: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speaks a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing concerning Russian meddling in the 2016 United States election, on Capitol Hill, March 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. While both the Senate and House Intelligence committees have received private intelligence briefings in recent months, Monday's hearing is the first public hearing on alleged Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 election. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Now that the White House is poised to approve the release of Democrats’ memo rebutting the controversial Republican-drafted memo from the House Intelligence Committee alleging abuses of the surveillance process by top Justice Department and FBI officials, Republicans in Congress are working to undermine the Democratic memo.

In an interview that aired Tuesday evening, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), a member of the Intelligence Committee involved in crafting the Republican memo, floated a theory that Democrats purposefully wrote a memo that would need redactions so that they could then attack Trump’s redactions as political censorship.

“I think the Democrats are politically smart enough to put things in the memo that require either the bureau or the Department of Justice to say it needs to be redacted. Therefore, it creates this belief that there’s something being hidden from the American people,” Gowdy told Fox News’ Martha MacCallum.

“Unfortunately, we’re in an environment where you would include material that you know has to be redacted and you know responsible people are going to redact it just so that questions will be asked,” he added.

Gowdy’s comments came after Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the ranking member on the Intelligence Committee, warned on CNN Tuesday morning that Trump could make “political redactions” on the Democratic rebuttal memo.

Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), who is leading the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, made a similar accusation on Tuesday.

“You have to hand it to them; they set themselves up in a really great position,” Conaway said, according to the Washington Post. “The other side will be able to say, ‘Well something politically was redacted out of there,’ and how do you prove that being wrong? Because it’s stuff we can’t tell people about.”

A Republican lawmaker anonymously pushed the conspiracy theory about the Democratic memo to the Washington Examiner, ostensibly in an effort to drum up skepticism about that memo.

“Part of what they are going to do is to talk about how the White House redacted their memo and didn’t redact the Republican one,” one Republican lawmaker told the Examiner. “Part of the plan was, let’s create a document that gets eviscerated in the scrubbing and comes out with a bunch of redactions and they say, look, the White House is hiding something.”

Later in his interview on Fox News, Gowdy aired skepticism for another narrative floated by lawmakers in Congress and President Donald Trump: that the Republican memo proves that the Justice Department and FBI were out to get Trump.

“I never allege a conspiracy when simple incompetence will suffice as an explanation,” he said. “I would not allege that the bureau and the Department of Justice had a conspiracy. I’ve got really serious questions about why they handled things certain ways, but I don’t start with conspiracy.”

Read the latest editor’s brief (Prime access) on the Russia probe »

 

 

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Aaaaaaand, Mr Conspiracy Theory is back.

  2. EXactLy. LibTards are unAmericAn grifters seeKing to undErmine the rule of laW. If HitlarY waS presiDent thE Stock MarkeT woulD endure Record settinG losses aNd we wouLd all be speakinG russiaN!

  3. Nice try Gowdy
    Your collection of idiots started it
    You know the truth
    The only thing behind the Nunes memo was an attempt to derail the Russian investigation.
    We called your bluff.
    You also know from seeing the classified info that they are dirty . Russian money everywhere which is why they are so desperate to kill the investigation.
    They are not doing it because they respect Trump
    They’re doing it to cover their asses.
    But you know that , which is why you decided Hmmm I don’t think I’ll run this time
    I love the smell of desperation in the morning

  4. Avatar for jep07 jep07 says:

    “a memo that would need redactions so that they could then attack Trump’s redactions as political censorship.”

    It is probably even more subtle than that… they likely included some serious charges that Trump will want covered-up because he knows the real secrets of his own mischief, there will be redactions that look like confessions.

    Super-Smart Dems v. Super-Greedy Republicans, it never ends in this two-party milieu.

    When the Dems win, the Republicans change the rules so they can’t win like that again, in a cycle of reactionary legislation for no other purpose. Then they get up the next day and do it again.

    Kind of like the movie Groundhog’s Day.

  5. Avatar for bp bp says:

    Gowdy pretends to be the guy who questions everyone’s motive. He is so pure that he is leaving Congress. Good riddance of an asshole who spent most of his time working against Clinton.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

84 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for bp Avatar for zandru Avatar for sysprog Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for jep07 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for catfish Avatar for mark_in_queens Avatar for sfaw Avatar for keninmn Avatar for dickweed Avatar for gajake Avatar for demyankee Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for rod Avatar for judygran Avatar for brian512 Avatar for greysea Avatar for katscherger Avatar for kenga Avatar for theuniversalexecutive

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: