ACLU: Gov’t Wants ‘Complete Record’ On Some Anti-Trump Facebook Accounts

Demonstrators march Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017, in Atlanta. Thousands of people marched through Atlanta one day after President Donald Trump's inauguration. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)
Demonstrators march Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017, in Atlanta. Thousands of people marched through Atlanta one day after President Donald Trump's inauguration. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Department of Justice government obtained warrants in February to seize the complete information on three anti-Trump Facebook users’ accounts. One group on the social media site included in the three warrants could expose the information of thousands of other Facebook users who interacted with it.

The warrants — for Lacy MacAuley, Legba Carrefour and the DisruptJ20 Facebook page, run by Emmelia Talarico — were initially placed under a gag order, LawNewz first reported Thursday. But after Facebook successfully fought to have the gag removed in mid-September, the ACLU of Washington, D.C. filed a motion to quash, or limit, the warrants on behalf of the three users.

According to ACLU lawyer Scott Michelman’s filing Thursday, the government’s warrants aim to seize all information associated with the three accounts, including individuals’ information who interacted with the DisruptJ20 Facebook page. The warrants came as part of an investigation into alleged rioting on Inauguration Day.

Michelman said the request was overly broad and could lead to so-called “exploratory rummaging” through the electronic information of Facebook users who had nothing to do with the alleged rioting.

“The warrants make no provision for avoiding or minimizing invasions into personal and associational/expressive information, for preventing such information from being shared widely within the government, or for destroying irrelevant material when the investigation is concluded,” Michelman wrote.

He added: “Government agents would gain access to the Intervenors’ communications with friends and family members, and pictures and names of their family members, including the pictures and names of minor children and pictures of an Intervenor’s child relatives in the bath,” among other extremely sensitive information, such as “political activities and associations.”

DisruptJ20, which served as a hub of sorts for anti-Trump inauguration event planning, hosted information on its Facebook page unrelated to any smashed windows or rioting, Michelman argued, “such as a peaceful dance-party protest to call attention to the anti-LGBTQ stance of the incoming Vice President.”

The government charged more than 200 people with various crimes following the inaugural protests in Washington, D.C., during which some protesters broke windows and lit fires in the street. Those charged included journalists, legal observers and bystanders. Judge Lynn Leibovitz recently refused to drop any charges against the nearly 200 individuals remaining to be tried.

Prosecutors also requested information from disruptj20.org,’s web host, DreamHost, on the protest website’s more than 1 million visitors. After DreamHost objected to the warrant, the government trimmed its request somewhat, and Judge Robert Morin ultimately ruled that DreamHost must turn over large amounts of users’ data, though he said the data would be handled under the court’s supervision

In his filing Thursday, Michelman was blunt: “The enforcement of these warrants would reach deeply into individuals’ private lives and protected associational and political activity.”

Read the ACLU’s filing below:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. …and so it begins…the dismantling of our ‘rights’.

  2. Avatar for jsfox jsfox says:

    I wonder if anyone with half a brain still thinks Trump et al aren’t fascist

  3. “Over the line, dude!” – W. Sobchak. This is absolute overreach, and I hope the ACLU succeeds in quashing this subpoena. Apparently, it’s now a crime to criticize the Naked Emperor…oooo kkkkkk.

  4. Facebook successfully fought to have the gag removed

    This, for me, is the most disturbing part of this entire, very disturbing, story. The gag order clearly shows the Trump administration deliberately seeking to cast a a veil of stealth over its dismantling of civil rights. If Facebook hadn’t chosen to risk the administration’s wrath by fighting that gag order, thousands of people who did nothing more than Like a planned protest event would have already been placed on a secretive enemies list – with zero public disclosure of that having happened.

  5. Reading or commenting on an anti trump posting on Facebook is now a crime?
    Reading is now a crime
    Only in trump’s fascist America.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

43 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for ghost Avatar for jsfox Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for epicurus Avatar for irasdad Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for nymund Avatar for bardi Avatar for dddinah Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for maricaibo Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for socalista Avatar for thinski Avatar for matt_shuham Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for jeannes Avatar for ohcomeonnow Avatar for karlwlewis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: