GOP Waters Down Opposition To Gay Marriage In Draft Party Platform

Jennifer Marshall, with the Heritage Foundation, and Summer Ingram, with the Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation, who said they support "traditional marriage" hold balloons that says "protect religious liberty" ou... Jennifer Marshall, with the Heritage Foundation, and Summer Ingram, with the Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation, who said they support "traditional marriage" hold balloons that says "protect religious liberty" outside of the Supreme Court Friday June 26, 2015, in Washington, before the court declared that same-sex couples have a right to marry anywhere in the US. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In a draft of the party platform that will be ratified at next week’s Republican National Convention, the GOP signaled a major shift in its position on gay marriage and dropped its call for a constitutional amendment that would limit marriage to heterosexual couples, CNN reported. Instead the draft platform says that the issue should be left to the states to determine, according to CNN.

November’s election is the first national election since the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in its 2015 decision Obergefell v. Hodges.

A desire for a constitutional amendment that defined marriage nationwide as between a man and a woman has been part of the Republican Party platform since 2004, CNN said. This year’s version however, while still voicing opposition to the Supreme Court decision, says states should determine their marriage laws.

“We urge (the decision’s) reversal whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to the states,” the draft says, according to CNN.

The new language is more in line with the posturing of the GOP’s presumptive nominee Donald Trump on the issue. After the Obergefell decision, Trump did not call for a constitutional amendment that would restrict marriage to heterosexual couples, as some of the other Republican primary candidates at the time advocated. In January he said that he “would strongly consider” appointing Supreme Court justices who would overturn Obergefell, but that that he wished “it was done by the states.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Dubya: Very disappointing. All my accomplishments are being replaced by the pesky and immoral liberals.

  2. Watered down? A distinction without a difference.

    Your GOP today: as racist & homophobic as your grandfather’s GOP.

  3. They dearly wanted to leave slavery, segregated schools, prayer in school and contraception up to the states. Ah well, those isues can be addressed down the road.

  4. So they want to weaken SCOTUS rulings when they don’t go their way? Wasn’t leaving it up to the states is what got us to the SCOTUS ruling in the first place?

  5. So in a “GOP nation” (HEAVEN FORBID!), a couple is married in one state. They cross the border and they are not married. And so forth. No, marriage is one thing that surely CANNOT be left to the states. Hell, if marriage were left to the states, most of those lovely states of the rebellion would still be outlawing interracial marriage.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for dwward Avatar for jw1 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for lastroth Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for dickweed Avatar for beattycat Avatar for sidney76 Avatar for jordanolsen26 Avatar for edhedh Avatar for progressivebroad Avatar for abacusdog

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: