Gingrich: ‘No Idea’ What Trump Meant By Tweet Appearing To Confirm Probe

FILE - In this Nov. 21, 2016 file photo, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks to the media in Trump Tower in New York. The White House and its allies have stepped up attacks on a foe typically associated with fr... FILE - In this Nov. 21, 2016 file photo, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks to the media in Trump Tower in New York. The White House and its allies have stepped up attacks on a foe typically associated with fragile democracies, military coups and spy thrillers. The so-called “the deep state,” an alleged shadowy network of powerful entrenched federal and military interests, has increasingly become the focus of Republicans who blame such forces for deliberately trying to undermine the new president. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump, on Sunday said he had “no idea” what Trump was trying to do with a tweet that appeared to confirm he is personally under federal investigation.

“Trump has a compulsion to counterattack and is very pugnacious. I don’t think it serves him well. I don’t think that tweet helped him,” Gingrich said on ABC’s “This Week.”

He said Trump was “infuriated” by “this Russia baloney,” apparently referring to the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Asked whether Trump was confirming the existence of an investigation into himself using the tweet, Gingrich replied: “I have no idea what he thought he was doing.”

The Washington Post reported last week that Robert Mueller, special counsel overseeing the federal probe into Russian meddling, took over an investigation into the possibility that Trump obstructed justice. Trump appeared to confirm that he was under investigation in a tweet posted Friday.

Jay Sekulow, an attorney on Trump’s legal team, pushed back on that interpretation on Sunday.

“The response from the President, using social media, was about that story,” he said. “But let me be very clear here, as it has been since the beginning, the President is not and has not been under investigation for obstruction.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. “And only I can fix it,” through the agency of stooge-agent-surrogates who will tell all of you that I never said what I said.

  2. “I mean, I was rather straightfoward with my dying wife when I visited her in the hospital and told her I wanted a divorce to marry my mistress,” the disgraced former House Speaker later added.

  3. Context is everything.

  4. “The response from the President, using social media, was about that story,” he said. “But let me be very clear here, as it has been since the beginning, the President is not and has not been under investigation for obstruction.”

    That was very clear. Since you were so clear that he’s not under investigation for obstruction that what is he under investigation for?

  5. We’ll just add this to the ever growing list of things about which Gingrich has no idea.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

70 more replies

Participants

Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sysprog Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for jep07 Avatar for navamske Avatar for krusher Avatar for mothermachree Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for sandyh Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for kitty Avatar for dickweed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for tena Avatar for clauscph Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for thinski Avatar for edgewise

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: