NIH Official: West Africa Travel Ban Could Be ‘Counterproductive’

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, appears before lawmakers on Capitol Hill as the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigat... Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, appears before lawmakers on Capitol Hill as the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations holds a hearing to examine the government's response to contain Ebola and whether America's hospitals and health care workers are adequately prepared for Ebola patients. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, on Sunday said that the calls for travel bans from West Africa don’t make much sense.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have now called for the U.S. to ban individuals traveling from the countries impacted by the Ebola outbreak from coming into the U.S. if they are not American citizens.

But Fauci said that such a ban could just be “counterproductive.”

“[W]hen people come in from a country it’s much easier to track them if you know where they’re coming from,” he said about a travel ban on ABC’s “This Week.” “But what you do if you then completely ban travel there’s the feasibility of going to other countries where we don’t have a travel ban and have people come in.”

Fauci said that while he opposes a travel ban, he recognizes that there’s a valid argument in support of it.

“I think one needs to understand that people who say that, we respect that opinion and we understand that there’s some rationale for that,” he said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for korvu korvu says:

    Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have now called for the U.S. to ban individuals traveling from the countries impacted by the Ebola outbreak from coming into the U.S. if they are not American citizens.

    Because, as we know, American citizens are exceptional and can’t catch Ebola.

  2. Avatar for pine pine says:

    I guess if there were direct flights from the stricken countries,but I heard a discussion this morning that say’s that is not the case.

  3. Avatar for pine pine says:

    This is the same guy who said this on a different show :

    "WTF:

    "WASHINGTON – A top official at the National Institutes of Health
    disagreed on Sunday with the notion that an Ebola vaccine likely would
    have been discovered by now had it not been for federal budget cuts.“I
    won’t agree with that. I have to tell you quite honestly, I think that
    the NIH has had constraints in resources for 10 years, and all the
    biomedical research has been less than its robust activity,” Dr. Anthony
    Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
    Diseases, said during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” But he
    refused to speculate about what medical developments those constraints
    may have prevented. "You can’t say that – I think you can’t say we
    would or would not have this or that. Everything is slowed down, but I
    wouldn’t make that statement.“Fauci was responding to the
    suggestion from Dr. Francis Collins, the head of the NIH, that a decade
    of budget austerity had slowed down research on vaccines and infectious
    diseases, and perhaps had prevented an Ebola vaccine from being
    developed and ready for the outbreak that has devastated West Africa.”

  4. “[W]hen people come in from a country it’s much easier to track them if you know where they’re coming from,” he said about a travel ban on ABC’s “This Week.” “But what you do if you then completely ban travel there’s the feasibility of going to other countries where we don’t have a travel ban and have people come in.”

    1. We don’t have any direct flights to the afflicted countries. So that’s what’s happening now. Thomas Duncan came in from Belgium. There can be no such thing as a “travel ban” with the afflicted countries, because there’s no travel to ban.

    2. If someone in a city had something contagious, that individual would be quarantined. One doesn’t implement a quarantine by isolating everyone else EXCEPT the infected individual, unless, of course, you’re a bass-ackwards Republican (or a Democrat who thinks like one to suck up to dimwits in the run-up to the election.)

    Bottom line: until we’re prepared to stop all commercial travel and shipping of goods from every location on earth, not just countries with predominantly black people in them, this call for a travel ban will be nothing more than political grandstanding to curry favor with the anti-intellectual fear-addled Honey-Boo-Boo electorate.

    If, on the other hand, our objective is to quash the threat instead of sticking our collective head up our ass and hoping it all just goes away, we need to suck it up and get busy and not be distracted by this nonsense. Perhaps 50,000 people in the US alone die from influenza every year. Let’s keep things in perspective, shall we?

    A great leader (oh, where are they now?) once said “we have nothing to fear but fear itself.”   For all the shit Obama gets for allegedly lacking leadership, I’m not seeing any among the political class who level that critique. Rather, it’s been let no crisis pass unadvantaged.

  5. Since no flights from the affected countries go to the US the discussion is pointless. But it’s entertaining to see so-called “conservatives” demanding that jack-booted government thugs tell airlines where they can and cannot fly to.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

15 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dwc Avatar for Diogenes67 Avatar for pickwick Avatar for radicalcentrist Avatar for trippin Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for kirenos Avatar for topcat Avatar for korvu Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for pine Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: