Dem Sen.: On Russia, Shutting Down The Government Is ‘The Only Card We’ve Got’

Delaware U.S. Senate candidate Chris Coons looks at his opponent, Christine O'Donnell, as she makes a thumbs-up sign during their debate at Widener Law School in Wilmington Tuesday, October 19, 2010. (AP Photo/Rob... Delaware U.S. Senate candidate Chris Coons looks at his opponent, Christine O'Donnell, as she makes a thumbs-up sign during their debate at Widener Law School in Wilmington Tuesday, October 19, 2010. (AP Photo/Robert Craig, Pool) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) said Monday that shutting down the government was Democrats’ “ultimate card” to compel Republicans to work with them in investigating possible ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.

In a radio interview, Coons was asked specifically about Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats’ request that Attorney General Jeff Sessions testify before the committee again, after Sessions confirmed that he met twice with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the presidential campaign.

Sessions has since said he would recuse himself from campaign-related matters at the Department of Justice. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of that committee, said Friday that he would not ask Sessions to testify again about his meetings with the ambassador.

“We have no authority. Speaking as a Democrat in the minority on the Judiciary Committee, I can’t compel him to do anything,” Coons told public radio station WHYY, in an interview surfaced by CNN.

“If Republicans don’t step up and challenge some of these actions and some of these statements, they’ll be able to continue working along with the administration, and frankly, bury or stonewall this investigation,” he said. “So it’s critical to work with Republicans to help them recognize the centrality of this investigation to the rule of law, to the respect for our democracy, and to our future.”

Asked if Democrats had any way to compel Republican action, including not voting on Judge Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation to the Supreme Court, Coons said that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer “is regularly negotiating with Majority Leader McConnell over what we are willing to do or not do to shut down the government or shut down the Senate.”

“We’re Democrats. We don’t want to shut down the government. We actually think the government overall does good things for the American people,” he said. “When Sen. Cruz led a successful effort to shut down the government of the United States for 17 days, thousands of federal agencies and offices and functions shut down for several weeks. I heard very loudly and clearly from the people of Delaware, they don’t want us to do that.”

“That’s our ultimate card, is to threaten to shut down the government when we get to the end of the funding, that’s coming up fairly soon, the end of the continuing resolution. But that’s really the only card we’ve got.”

The continuing resolution funding the federal government is set to expire on April 28.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Okay, I get this, I really do. But no, just no.

    Edited to add a comment I made later in the thread: The trouble with blackmail is that you have to not care about what you’re blackmailing the other person about. And you have to have an end game. In particular, what happens when your bluff gets called? How far are you prepared to go?

    I’m sorry but I just don’t see this ending well for Democrats. What I do see, or foresee, at any rate, is Republicans salivating at the thought of playing their usual games with this.

  2. Republican, Faux news , Conservative entertainment complex,
    Apoplexy , heads exploding
    3…2…1…
    SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT!!!

  3. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Do it - when it gets to the point where they won’t do what is right for American then shut this bitch down.

    Don’t tiptoe around saying O we’re the good guys we don’t want to do this.

    This government is not a legitimate government. We need to stop it any way we can.

  4. Sorta off topic, but a question in my mind lately and if anyone knows: IIRC, our government has in place a fully-named “shadow” government who are always waiting in the wings should a disaster take out everyone in the line of succession to the presidency. Do we know who those folks are this go-round? Who names them? Considering the magnitude of the clusterfuck we’re currently mired in, would it be out of the question to have SCOTUS nullify the current “administration” along with last year’s federal election results AND install said shadow government while we set a new election date? I mean, this is already at national emergency level. Seriously.

  5. Drastic times can take drastic measures.

    I think we passed drastic about 6 or 7 weeks ago.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

176 more replies

Participants

Avatar for david_e_brown Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for blandsten Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for becca656 Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for zoester Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for darcy Avatar for tena Avatar for beattycat Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for witcheekate Avatar for demyankee Avatar for katscherger Avatar for maximus Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for bobef

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: