Clinton On ‘Super-Predator’ Speech: ‘I Shouldn’t Have Used Those Words’

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks at a campaign event at the Williamsburg County Recreation Center in Kingstree, S.C., Thursday, Feb. 25, 2016. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told The Washington Post Thursday that she wouldn’t have used the words she did to describe some children from crime-ridden communities in a speech she gave in 1996.

“Looking back, I shouldn’t have used those words, and I wouldn’t use them today,” Clinton said in the statement to the Post.

A Black Lives Matter activist interrupted Clinton’s speech at a private fundraiser Wednesday in Charleston, South Carolina and asked her to apologize for mass incarceration. The demonstrator held a sign that read, “We have to bring them to heel,” a reference to Clinton’s 1996 speech.

“They’re not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called super-predators,” she said at the time. “No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel.”

Clinton further explained the context of that speech in her statement to the Post, clarifying that she was “talking about the impact violent crime and vicious drug cartels were having on communities across the country and the particular danger they posed to children and families.”

Latest Livewire
124
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. It has come to this. Hillary must explain and apologize for too-colorful a description of lawbreakers twenty years ago, while Trump gets to insult the Pope with swear words last week and folks cheer.

  2. Well, one is running for President of the United States, the other is running for President of the Confederacy.

  3. Avatar for atchka atchka says:

    Hang on a second: you really think people hold Clinton and Trump to the same standard? Trump’s comments will bite him in the ass in the General, even if they aren’t now. But, more importantly, we should hold Hillary to a higher standard than Trump. Her words were deeply offensive. “Bring to heel”? Super-predators? These were racist then and they’re racist now. Hindsight does not erase that.

  4. If you remember the general tone back then, her phrase was pretty mild.

    But why are we comparing what she said a few decades ago, in the general context of public opinion at the time, with what the leading GOP contender is saying now several times a day? Huh?

  5. I hope you are right. But for 8 months I have been over-estimating the tolerance and intelligence of American voters.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

118 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for k_in_va Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for redrasputinmn Avatar for feathered_head Avatar for ajileye Avatar for mymy Avatar for humpback Avatar for maksutov66 Avatar for lio Avatar for jinx_tpm Avatar for skippyflipjack Avatar for mjshep Avatar for mxyztplk Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for seedeevee Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for synergie Avatar for tesla Avatar for atchka Avatar for 1988ranger Avatar for aunt_sue

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: