Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) on Thursday said President Donald Trump should match fired FBI Director James Comey and testify under oath and in public.
Following Comey’s appearance in an open session before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Murphy released a statement saying it was “hard to overstate the impact” of Comey’s testimony.
“If the White House’s account differs from what we heard today, the American people deserve to hear the President’s side of the story in a similar forum – under oath and open to the press,” Murphy said.
“It’s hard to overstate the impact of Jim Comey’s testimony today. For the first time, under oath and penalty of perjury, the former FBI Director testified that the president repeatedly pressed him for a pledge of loyalty, and asked him to drop the investigation into illegal activity of a White House staffer at the center of the Russia probe. A couple months later, after neither request was fulfilled, Trump fired him,” said Murphy. “That confirms that media reports aren’t ‘fake news’ – they’re very real and very concerning.”
“Every day, it seems like the walls are closing in on this president. What’s most important is that investigators in the Senate and at the Department of Justice get all the facts and find the truth. If the White House’s account differs from what we heard today, the American people deserve to hear the president’s side of the story in a similar forum – under oath and open to the press,” added Murphy.
Donnie is physically and mentally incapable of telling the truth, oath or no oath…
But it would be a beautiful thing to watch him perjure himself repeatedly under oath.
Just let him tweet it… he no doubt will find a way to expose himself, he’s 100% since election day…
Donnie will resign before he would ever do such a thing. Under oath? never.
What a novel and refreshing idea! He’s right, of course.
The President is said to be first citizen of the nation. Why shouldn’t he (or she, soon, I hope) go before Congress, take the oath, sit down and answer questions? (Yes, I know about separation of powers. But a lot of questions could be answered without trampling on the Constitution.)