Indiana’s Top Lawmakers Looking To Clarify Religious Freedom Law

House Speaker Brian Bosma, right, R-Indianapolis, responds to a question during a news conference after Indiana Gov. Mike Pence delivered his State of the State address to a joint session of the Legislature at the St... House Speaker Brian Bosma, right, R-Indianapolis, responds to a question during a news conference after Indiana Gov. Mike Pence delivered his State of the State address to a joint session of the Legislature at the Statehouse Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014, in Indianapolis. Senate Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, is at left. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Two of the top lawmakers in the Indiana state legislature, both Republicans, explained Monday morning that they plan to push an amendment “clarifying” the controversial religious freedom law Gov. Mike Pence (R) signed last week that could allow businesses to discriminate against same-sex couples.

At a press conference early on Monday, Indiana House Speaker Brian Bosma (pictured, left) and Indiana Senate President Pro Tempore David Long said that they would “encourage our colleagues to adopt a clarifying measure of some sort to remove this misconception about the bill.”

Long said this was a reaction to an “obvious misconception” about what the new law does.

Some high-profile figures and businesses with major stakes in Indiana warned of a backlash of the law’s effect before Pence signed it into effect, saying it would effectively license businesses to discriminate against gay individuals. That criticism only intensified after the law was signed. National figures like Apple CEO Tim Cook and Saleforce CEO Marc Benioff have strongly criticized the law.

Pence has failed to give examples justifying signing the law and on Sunday wouldn’t say if it would allow discrimination. He also announced that he would push to clarify the law.

Bosma and Long stressed that they hadn’t anticipated the backlash of the law. Asked about both proponents of the law and opponents who said the law effectively discriminated against same-sex individuals. Long said that there was just a “small tribe” of people saying that.

“The fact is that it doesn’t do that, it doesn’t discriminate and anyone on either side of this issue suggesting otherwise is just plain flat wrong,” Long said.

Throughout the press conference, both lawmakers said repeatedly the legislation does not directly discriminate against anyone.

“What it does is it sets a standard of review for a court when issues of religious freedom and other rights collide due to government action,” Bosma said.

Indiana Democrats quickly responded to the press conference saying that they wouldn’t be satisfied with anything less than a full repeal of the law.

Latest Livewire
79
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. What is there to clarify?

    This bill is designed to allow homophobes and bigots to hide their prejudice behind their religion and eventually people will start using it to deny other groups service too.

  2. Avatar for dv01 dv01 says:

    If there is one good thing to come out of this stupid law, it is the very real and very hot heat the folks in Indiana are feeling right now.

  3. Note to Speaker Bosma: when choosing a fig leaf to cover your bits, don’t grab the one that’s on fire :fire:

  4. Avatar for jalus jalus says:

    "You shouldn’t force me to participate in beliefs I don’t share," say the people who claim we’re a ‘Christian’ nation whether we like it or not.

  5. Avatar for spiff spiff says:

    Clarify? WTF? How would one “clarify” the law without essentially repealing it?

    The fact that these two idiotic republican “leaders” couldn’t spell out in their press conference how they would fix the law just proves (again) that they are clueless morons.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

73 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for jw1 Avatar for liberaljesus Avatar for leftflank Avatar for scottnatlanta Avatar for tsalagi51 Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for senjaybulworth Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for yankeeclipper Avatar for rev Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for taters Avatar for ottnott Avatar for starquest Avatar for heartttt Avatar for barblzz Avatar for darrtown Avatar for cincypix Avatar for raincntry Avatar for tsp Avatar for wtf1 Avatar for jalus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: