Former FBI Director James Comey will dispute President Donald Trump’s account of their conversations when he testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee this week, but will not accuse Trump of obstructing justice, ABC News reported on Tuesday.
ABC News reported, citing an unnamed source familiar with Comey’s thinking, that he will contest Trump’s claim that Comey told him three times that he was not under investigation by the FBI as part of its probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
According to the report, Comey told associates that he will stop short of accusing the President of obstructing justice by interfering with that investigation.
Comey “is not going to Congress to make accusations about the President’s intent” but rather to “share his concerns” and discuss “what made him uneasy,” the source told ABC News.
The New York Times reported in May that Trump asked Comey to drop the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, a request that Comey documented in a contemporaneous memo.
The White House pushed back on the report, and denied that Trump asked Comey “to end any investigation, including any investigation involving General Flynn.”
“This is not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the president and Mr. Comey,” the White House said in a statement. “The president has the utmost respect for our law enforcement agencies, and all investigations.”
CNN reported last week that Comey plans to testify that Trump pressured him to drop the investigation.
Deputy White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said on Monday that Trump will not use executive privilege to try and block Comey from testifying.
Of course Mr. purity would never make accusations! That the prosecutor’s job! (exception is dastardly Clinton)
Comey doesn’t need to accuse PeePee of obstructing justice. That wouldn’t be his role anyway. What Comey can do is provide all of the minute details that would lead a normal, thinking person to put together the pieces and build the case for obstruction of justice.
Probably the right approach for someone who is now effectively a fact witness. Just say what happened and let others conclude that the facts amount to obstruction of justice.
It’s the proper course of action for him. Let Mueller accuse the president after hearing all the facts.
Desn’t need to
Not his job
That’s for the independent investigator .
He’s FBI donchaknow