GOP Lawmakers Wake Up To The Nightmare: Trump Ain’t Changing

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump smiles during a campaign stop, Wednesday, Feb. 17, 2016, in Bluffton, S.C. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

When Donald Trump emerged as the presumptive Republican nominee in May, a GOP in denial reassured itself that the divisive, name-calling candidate who dominated the primaries would make a dignified turn toward the general election. A month later, Republicans are beginning to wake up. Trump might never change.

“For those of us who had hoped we would see the 2.0 version, I think the realization is coming that we got what we got,” said Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) who has yet to endorse Trump. “That is not somebody who can win the White House.”

For months, Trump has made remarks and taken policy stances that many warned were dangerous, unlawful and even racist. Instead of moderating since he emerged as the party’s presumptive nominee, he kicked it up a notch with a sustained, racially-tinged attack on a federal judge presiding over lawsuits against his business.

With Trump’s repeated claims that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s Latino heritage made him biased against the mogul — claims that he continued to make even after widespread GOP condemnation — Republicans are not only growing increasingly aware that there nominee may squander their best chance in years to put a Republican in the White House. They are now openly worried that Trump’s behavior could imperil the GOP for generations with minority voters.

“It’s time to quit attacking various people that you competed with or various minority groups within the country and get on message,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said Tuesday during his Capitol Hill press conference. He repeated his serious concerns that Trump could alienate Latino voters from the GOP in the same way that 1964’s nominee Barry Goldwater turned off African American voters from the party for decades.

The reality is sinking in. The clock is ticking. Trump isn’t changing. And the line he is forcing other Republicans too walk is grimace-worthy, to say the least. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) called Trump’s attacks on the judge “the textbook definition of a racist comment” at a press conference, while repeating that he still supports presumptive nominee.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), one of Trump’s GOP toughest critics, told reporters at the Capitol that he understood why Ryan, as House speaker, had to support Trump, but cautioned, “Mr. Trump needs to make it possible for our people to support him.”

“I can understand not breaking now, but if he continues this — after everyone has literally…[been] begging him not do it — then it really puts us in a spot about 2016 versus the future of the party,” Graham said.

Even Trump’s biggest cheerleaders on the Capitol Hill were put in an awkward position by the latest controversy.

Senate Foreign Relations Chair Bob Corker (R-TN) — who praised Trump relatively early on and met with him at Trump Tower– warned that the Trump campaign had only two or three weeks to make the changes it needs to.

“He’s got a period of time where he can assess and understand the incredible opportunity that’s before him and he can change directions. If not, if he starts moving closer to the convention and it’s similar I think it’s very problematic,” Corker told reporters on the Hill.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the first senator to endorse Trump, at first tried to avoid commenting Tuesday on Trump’s remarks about the judge. But he later said, according to the Washington Post, that it was “important that the campaign put its full focus on this campaign, the issues of the campaign, the vulnerabilities of Hillary Clinton and try to avoid distractions and issues unrelated to what the American people are really concerned about.”

One of Trump’s top surrogates in the House, Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY) insisted on CNN, “It’s time to just let go of this … and move on.”

Not long after McConnell fired his warning shot that Trump’s behavior threatened long-term harm to the party, Trump’s campaign released a lengthy, meandering statement that looked like an attempt to put out the fire his comments about the judge had caused.

It did not mention Curiel by name, nor did it apologize to him or recant the comments directly. But rather, Trump said in the statement that it “is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage.”

“I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial,” Trump said in Thursday’s afternoon’s statement, adding that he would not be commenting on the case any further.

But a good deal of damage had already been done by that point, as some GOP elected officials had already come forward and said the comments had cost Trump their public backing.

Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), who faces a tough reelection race, formally withdrew his support. “Trump’s latest statements, in context with past attacks on Hispanics, women and the disabled like me, make it certain that I cannot and will not support my party’s nominee for President regardless of the political impact on my candidacy or the Republican Party,” his statement said.

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval (R), the state’s first Hispanic governor, said his vote for Trump is no longer “for sure.”

“I will only say that you can’t defend the indefensible,” Sandoval, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal

Some still held out hope Trump could shift his position, but even they were skeptical.

“I think there is always a hope that he is going to change his tone, and I think there is an expectation that he is going to change his tone,” Sen. John Thune (R-SD), a member of GOP leadership, said among reporters on the Hill. “If he doesn’t, I think this is going to be an ongoing problem for him. It’s going to make the hill to climb much steeper.”

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. I understand too well why the Donald can’t/won’t change. Like many of you here, I’ve gone from loving Bernie to despising Bernie. Unfortunately, I have friends and family who haven’t, who still think he’s the world’s savior. I’ve learned over and over that pointing out his weaknesses is useless, does no good and only upsets me. So these days, before I know I’ll be seeing a B supporter, I figuratively tape my mouth shut. I vow to myself that I won’t bring up anything political, and I won’t respond to politics. “I can do that” I tell myself. Well, guess what. I can’t. I’m able now to not initiate the subject, but when I hear something that I know is crazy, I respond. Yup, it’s hard to change. I think I’m a pretty reasonable person, but I can’t keep my mouth shut.

    I think of that whenever I read about someone saying the Donald is gonna change. My guess is that it’s even harder for him than it is for me. It ain’t gonna happen.

  2. Other than Trump being Trump, why is a presidential candidate talking about his personal lawsuit in a stump speech?

  3. The best these Republicans can make of this bad situation is to campaign for Republicans to turn out for the down-ticket vote, to ensure Congress stays red.

    But that means more or less tacitly - if not explicitly - admitting the WH will go to Hillary.

    I didn’t say it was a good choice.

    GOP is stuck with a candidate who cannot win, who is running an amateur hour campaign in the face of the most experienced presidential nominee we’ve seen in a generation, who has a mansion full of dirty laundry, who is undisciplined and erratic, who regularly undermines advisors and won’t listen to expert advice.

    I expect by fall we will get to witness the spectacle of Trump being abandoned en masse by Republican pols and candidates.

  4. Avatar for 1gg 1gg says:

    George Bernard Shaw’s quote perfectly sums up Trump:
    “Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

114 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for alliebean Avatar for charliee Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for dweb Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for progressiveoldman Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for jprfrog Avatar for benthere Avatar for meta Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for vladomatic Avatar for glenn414 Avatar for mpower1952 Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for katscherger Avatar for cybermindgrrl

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: