Trump & Co Decide Individual Federal Judges Do Have Too Much Power After All 

This is your TPM evening briefing.
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - FEBRUARY 09: U.S. President Donald Trump attends the Super Bowl LIX Pregame at Caesars Superdome on February 09, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Roc Nation)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It’s no surprise that an expanding group of federal district judges, appointed by presidents of both parties, are systematically blocking President Trump’s and Elon Musk’s power grabs. This is, after all, how the system works. 

Yet Trump’s advisors are outraged. “If a district court judge wants control over the entire executive branch…he should run for president,” Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller tweeted Tuesday. 

For those of us who lived through the reigns of Judges Matthew Kacsmaryk and Reed O’Connor (so, like, we who were alive six months ago), this is a surprising turn of events. 

The Kacsmaryks and O’Connors thwarted the Biden administration constantly, and on much hackier grounds than the bipartisan swath of judges are acting on now. The resulting epidemic of right-wing litigants challenging federal government actions in the random corners of Texas under the control of these friendly judges grew to such proportions that both congressional Democrats and the administrative bodies of the courts halfheartedly gestured in the direction of doing something to fix it.

Republicans, though, were just fine with the blatant gaming of the court system. At worst, the amenable district judge would get overturned months down the line; they still got sand thrown in the Biden administration’s gears in the meantime. 

In a stunning turn of events, it turns out Miller et al. don’t at all like being on the other end of this dynamic. 

But like much in the Trump era, the administration is going to such extremes that pointing out the hypocrisy almost feels beside the point. Miller’s grousing takes on a darker patina when contextualized in the reality that Trump and his cohort are actively softening the ground to ignore a court order — which would spark a full-blown constitutional crisis. 

The Best Of TPM Today

Durbin Implores Senate GOP To ‘Pause’ On Patel Amid Claims He Covertly Managed FBI Purge

Cowed Republican Senators Now Worried About Primary Challenges Backed By Trump OR Musk

Trump Is Predictably Sloppy And It’s Hurting Him In Court

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Trump Says Some Treasury Notes May Not Be Real

What We Are Reading

Top FEMA Official Is Fired Over Payments for N.Y.C. Migrant Shelters 

Judge orders Trump admin. to restore CDC and FDA webpages by midnight 

FEMA official ignores judge’s latest order, demands freeze on grant funding 

Latest Where Things Stand
76
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Um, no: it simply confirms the core principle that there is an in-group that laws are meant to protect and not bind while binding and not protecting others; this is consistent. Insisting judges get the unbound in-group right is the trick.

    ETA: there is only one principle essential to democracy and that is laws effect all equally; so goes that principle, so goes democracy, which is why oligarchs and tyrants strive to reverse it.

  2. Rolling corruption, rolling coup, rolling authoritarianism. Some headlines suggest we are on the verge of a Constitutional crisis. Verge? We are already deeply in a crisis!

  3. “If a district court judge wants control over the entire executive branch…he should run for president,” Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Aryan White Supremacy Stephen Miller tweeted Tuesday.

    FIFY

  4. Stephen Miller should be required to sit in a large tub of roaches on a regular basis to make his exterior more like his soul.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

70 more replies

Participants

Avatar for fess Avatar for knut Avatar for sysprog Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for losamigos Avatar for arrendis Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for southerndem Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for choska Avatar for formerChild Avatar for tcollier Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for kentford Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for justruss Avatar for m_buxbaum Avatar for captainfantastic Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for ladyfair Avatar for dogselfie Avatar for john_adams

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: