Key Nebraska Sen Rebuffs MAGA Attempt To Coax Him Into Depriving Harris Of Likely Electoral Vote

This is your TPM evening briefing.
TOPSHOT - Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump attends a town hall meeting at the Dort Financial Center in Flint, Michigan, on September 17, 2024. The event is moderated by Arkansas ... TOPSHOT - Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump attends a town hall meeting at the Dort Financial Center in Flint, Michigan, on September 17, 2024. The event is moderated by Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders. (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It’s becoming a theme: Donald Trump’s efforts to steal an election are quashed by the bravery of a few non-MAGA Republicans.

Into Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s (R) shoes stepped Nebraska Sen. Mike McDonnell (R) Monday, who said in a statement first reported by the Nebraska Examiner that he would not withdraw his support for the state divvying up its electoral votes by district. 

“After deep consideration, it is clear to me that right now, 43 days from Election Day, is not the moment to make this change,” he said in a statement. “I have notified Governor Pillen that I will not change my long-held position and will oppose any attempted changes to our electoral college system before the 2024 election.” 

Without his support, Republicans will likely be unable to overcome Democrats’ filibuster and change the system to the more typical winner-takes-all before the election. 

Trump’s camp had reignited its attempt to make this change in the past few days a) because VP Kamala Harris needs the one electoral vote from Nebraska’s second district to win if she takes the “blue wall states” (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan) but loses in the Sun Belt and b) seemingly because Maine, the only other state that distributes its electoral votes this way, had reached the point when it was constitutionally too late for state Democrats to change the law in response. 

It’s unclear whether national Democrats had a plan to counter this Republican attack if it came to fruition. A spokesperson for Nebraska Democrats told TPM that “ballots have already been mailed out — it is too late to change.” The Republican secretary of state’s office had said that how the electoral votes are allocated could be changed right up to the election, but the quote suggests that Democrats may have taken legal action based on that premise. 

If they didn’t have a plan, they put an awful lot of trust in the spine of one state-level Republican who was having the screws applied by everyone from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to Trump himself (okay, spine and political aspirations — McDonnell, a former Democrat, reportedly wants to run for mayor of Omaha, a much harder feat if he single-handedly deprives Omaha of its electoral relevance). Still, he’ll almost certainly face physical threats from the right for this decision, and it’s worth applauding.

For now, it’s an exhale from anti-Trump forces across the country who spent the last few nights tossing and turning, brains alight with visions of a 269-269 electoral college tie.

The Best Of TPM Today

How Sheriffs Define Law And Order For Their Counties Depends A Lot On Their Views—And Most Are White Republican Men

New Details Emerge On How Trump Already Weaponized DOJ The First Time

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Making America Deportable Again

What We Are Reading

The Long, Strange Saga of Kamala Harris and Kimberly Guilfoyle

Musk, Thiel and the shadow of apartheid South Africa

Trump’s Chief Legal Defender Vows a ‘Reign of Terror’ — Or Is It All an Act?

Latest Where Things Stand

Notable Replies

  1. So now will Trump turn to trying to split the electoral votes in light blue states so he can pick up a few more there?

  2. Something to notice about the NYT Arizona poll released today showing Trump up 50-45 over Harris. That same poll showed 58% of the voters were supporting the abortion rights amendment. So according to the NYT 13% of the voters for the abortion rights amendment are not supporting Harris. And about 10% of the voters for the abortion rights amendment are supporting Trump.

    That discordance is mathematically possible but strange. As Josh Marshall states in his editor’s column, the NYT has a different turnout model apparently than other polls. I am also guessing that the turnout model being used by the NYT does not admit any advantage for new young voters nor extra-turnout for those coming to vote for the abortion amendment.

    In fact one can ask, is the turnout model being used by the NYT for Harris the same turnout model that the NYT used for Biden? Inertia and consistency would imply that they have not changed their turnout model.

  3. At this point I’d be surprised if he didn’t try.

  4. I think the GOP controls the legistatures in CO, NH, and WI, all of which are going blue. Carve out the right districts, and voilà!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for jcs Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for lolly1128 Avatar for callmelefty Avatar for esva Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for hoagie Avatar for darrtown Avatar for chezzer14 Avatar for GhouledKS Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for tindalos Avatar for justruss Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for Le_Monde_Inverse Avatar for classicguitarnj

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: