House GOP Makes Official Its Plan For Devastating Cuts To Medicaid

This is your TPM evening briefing.
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 11: U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks during a news conference after the House Republican Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol Building on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. ... WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 11: U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks during a news conference after the House Republican Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol Building on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Republican leadership members spoke to reporters about U.S. President Donald Trump's actions in the first few weeks of his second term and progress on House Republicans budget plan. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In announcing their intentions to move forward with a mammoth one bill budget plan that will supposedly sweep up key elements of Donald Trump’s fiscal agenda, enact tax cuts and raise the debt ceiling, House Republicans have placed themselves on a collision course with not just members of their own conference but also Senate Republicans.

But one thing is clear now that has been clear for months: Medicaid, the program that covers health care costs for low-income Americans, is, by design, the main target of the House GOP’s federal spending cuts proposal.

Here’s a breakdown of the key elements of the budget blueprint, which the House Budget Committee released the text of Wednesday:

  • House Republicans want to enact $4.5 trillion worth of tax cuts over the course of the next decade, some of that will include extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts that provided the most benefits to wealthy Americans.
  • They propose $2 trillion in federal spending cuts.
  • Those spending cuts would offset the cost of the tax cuts, but only partially, meaning the entire proposal would actually end up adding trillions to the national deficit, roughly $3 trillion over 10 years, by the New York Times’ calculation.
  • That coupled with plans to raise the debt limit by $4 trillion has fiscal hawks in the House howling, Politico reported. Hardliners in the House Freedom Caucus are reportedly pressing for at least another $500 billion in spending cuts to be outlined in the proposal, plus they want to see work requirements (another GOP word for spending cuts) for Medicaid, food aid benefits and at least one other social safety net program made explicit in the resolution.
  • It is not entirely clear where the $2 trillion in cuts will come from, rather the House Budget Committee is proposing that various committees find enough savings to hit fixed spending reduction targets.

So while it is not explicitly stated in the House Budget Committee’s document, Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs are the programs most directly in the crosshairs. Here’s why: The document charges the House Energy and Commerce Committee with finding $880 billion in ten-year savings, more than half of the total cuts outlined in the proposal. It also directs the House Committee on Agriculture to identify another $230 billion in cuts. The Energy and Commerce Committee oversees Medicaid spending and the Ag panel has jurisdiction over SNAP and other nutritional programs.

While House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has pushed work requirement rhetoric in recent days when pressed on the nature of potential impending cuts to Medicaid and other social safety net programs, the magnitude of the spending reductions being proposed means cuts to Medicaid will have to extend far beyond Republicans simply imposing work requirements. That language has become a rhetorical catchall for Republicans for months as they sidestep engaging seriously on the political ramifications of cutting programs for low-income Americans to extend tax cuts for the wealthy.

Per HuffPost:

Republicans could for example try to introduce a “per capita cap” or some other mechanism that would limit federal spending on the program going forward, effectively ending the open-ended funding commitment Washington now makes to the states. Republicans could also roll back several reforms designed to make enrollment simpler, especially for children.

“Cuts of the magnitude required of the Energy and Commerce Committee leave little doubt that the Budget Resolution sets the stage for deep cuts to Medicaid,” Allison Orris, a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told HuffPost. “This is not a budget that protects Medicaid enrollees.”

Republicans have been rhetorically creative about shielding their interest in slashing the social safety net for years. And as TPM has reported, even before the new Congress was sworn in this year, House Republicans made it clear Medicaid was on the chopping block, even as Trump vowed to protect Social Security and Medicare at all costs.

In the new budgetary blueprint, they’re barely hiding the ball.

The Best Of TPM Today

EXCLUSIVE: Judicial Branch Swept Up In Trump-Musk Lease Termination Spree 

Ep. 360: ‘A Great Deal Of Ruin In A Nation’

The Musk-Trump Pact Is Sealed In Bizarre Oval Office Circus

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Trump Says Some Treasury Notes May Not Be Real

What We Are Reading

The Trump Administration Might Just Spend $400 Million on ‘Armored’ Teslas 

This obscure law is one reason Trump’s agenda keeps losing in court

Latest Where Things Stand
77
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I guess, so much for the old saw that Medicare, Medicaid and SS are third rails for politicians.

    When you have the world’s richest man backing you, you can pretty much do anything, regardless of who or what you are.

  2. once again, in Adam Serwer’s iconic phrase, the cruelty is the point

  3. So I guess that’s a photo of Mikey talking to Republican Jesus, so he can verify to any skeptics that Christ the Lord totally signs off on slashing health care for poor, seriously ill and elderly people to the bone and beyond?

  4. Evil. Monstrous. Vile.

  5. Not only is the hope I had gone… it’s getting so I cannot read the various news sites anymore. Even TPM shocks too much. Musk…trump… it’s sickening
    I fully expect my Social Security to be gone into trump or Elmo’s pocket

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for economides Avatar for becca656 Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for afisher Avatar for emjayay Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for southerndem Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for v12nna Avatar for justruss Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for carolson Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for captainfantastic Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for old_guru Avatar for Scoutmom

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Deputy Editor for News:
Deputy Editor for Audience and Strategy:
Editor-at-Large:
Contributing Editor:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: