Georgia Judge’s Abortion Decision Will Reverberate Across The South, Albeit Temporarily

This is your TPM evening briefing.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA - AUGUST 14: Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney receives documents from the county court clerk on August 14, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. District Attorney Fani Willis has been bringing ... ATLANTA, GEORGIA - AUGUST 14: Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney receives documents from the county court clerk on August 14, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. District Attorney Fani Willis has been bringing evidence before a grand jury, which today handed up indictments on alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results in the state, though it wasn't immediately clear if former President Donald Trump was named. (Photo by Megan Varner/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Fulton County Superior Judge Robert McBurney issued an order Monday striking down the state’s six-week abortion ban and allowing the procedure to be performed again in the state up until 22 weeks of pregnancy.

The order means that Georgia is now one of the most permissive states in the South when it comes to abortion access, joining Virginia, the only other state in the region that allows the procedure up until about 26 weeks of pregnancy — though Georgia’s status as such is likely only temporary.

“A review of our higher courts’ interpretations of ‘liberty’ demonstrates that liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her health care choices,” McBurney wrote. “That power is not, however, unlimited. When a fetus growing inside a woman reaches viability, when society can assume care and responsibility for that separate life, then — and only then — may society intervene.”

McBurney’s order Monday means that the state of Georgia can no longer enforce the six-week ban on abortion that Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed into law in 2019, but that did not take effect until 2022 around when the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade.

Monday’s ruling stems from a lawsuit brought back in 2019 by abortion advocates, SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective and other plaintiffs after Kemp signed the extreme restrictions into law. The case has since worked its way through the courts, in a journey the Atlanta Journal-Constitution breaks down here. McBurney ruled in 2022 that the 2019 law violated the U.S. Constitution and struck down the ban. The Georgia Supreme Court later reversed McBurney’s 2022 decision.

In his order Monday, McBurney noted that the six-week ban is dangerous given that most people do not know they are pregnant at that stage of the process. He also noted that the ban has had a disproportionate impact on women of color of Georgia — a bleak and disturbing reality that has gotten renewed publicity in recent weeks after ProPublica reported on the cases of two women who died in Georgia when they couldn’t access legal care. Vice President Kamala Harris has been particularly vocal about Georgia’s egregious ban in recent weeks as well.

“It is generally men who promote and defend laws like the LIFE Act, the effect of which is to require only women – and, given the socio-economic and demographic evidence presented at trial, primarily poor women, which means in Georgia primarily black and brown women – to engage in compulsory labor, i.e., the carrying of a pregnancy to term at the government’s behest,” McBurney wrote.

While the Monday order gives abortion advocates in the state a moment to breathe, it is likely a temporary moment of reprieve for those seeking care, both in Georgia and for those in neighboring states where the procedure is outlawed who may rush to Georgia to seek care in coming days. Per Laurie Sobel, the associate director for women’s health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, who spoke to The 19th:

“[Georgia is] going to be the closest place for people [to access abortions] in a lot of states,” Sobel said, adding that she believes the state will appeal the decision.

The Best Of TPM Today

Georgia Dems Sue Kemp To Compel Him To Hold Hearing On Rogue Election Board

Trump’s Obsession With Violence Becomes More Explicit

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Trump Camp Says State Menstrual Surveillance Programs are A-OK

What We Are Reading

Struggling Hardliner Ted Cruz Suddenly Insists He’s Bipartisan

Trump Says No One Could Have Predicted Hurricane at Peak of Hurricane Season 

The Only Patriotic Choice for President 

Latest Where Things Stand

Notable Replies

  1. Absolutely nailed it.

  2. This is the kind of jurisprudence that makes me proud of the state and federal benches.

  3. A judge revisits the meaning of “liberty,” and finds that it means what it sounds like it means.

    A whole lot of people are once again trying to survive in the wreckage of civilization after Mother Nature has opened a big can of whoopass on them. You’d think some would start thinking about things other than other womens’ uteri.

  4. TCF is going down hill fast. You need to plug in your cell phone to use it? Today was just a photo op for the campaign just like Arlington was. I just hope main stream media reports this without the sane washing.

  5. Avatar for noonm noonm says:

    A Judge in 2024 coming to basically the same conclusion as the SCOTUS 50 years ago. Further evidence the Roe was a sound decision.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for noonm Avatar for katscherger Avatar for lanabill Avatar for ladyfair

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: