Fed Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump’s Order Targeting Gender Affirming Care For Trans Youth

This is your TPM evening briefing.
A person waves a transgender pride flag during the People's March and rally to the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., United States, on January 18, 2025. (Photo by Nathan Morris/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal district court judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday afternoon blocking the enforcement of Donald Trump’s sweeping Jan. 28 executive order that sought to shut down gender affirming medical care for trans youth under the age of 19 nationwide.

Judge Brendan Hurson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, a Biden nominee, issued the decision from the bench earlier this afternoon and a written order is due out soon.

The ruling puts Trump’s executive order on hold while the case moves forward.

During Trump’s second week in office, he signed an executive order that declared the U.S. will not “fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support” gender transition for people under the age of 19. The executive order specifically sought to block trans youth from accessing gender-affirming medical care, such as blocking medical professionals from prescribing hormones or puberty blockers to patients under the age of 19. This executive order was separate from the one Trump signed on his first day back in the White House, which sought to enable discrimination against trans people across multiple agencies and departments within the federal government through a very specific and somewhat bizarre assertion that there are only two genders “at conception.”

Quickly after Trump signed the executive order seeking to ban gender affirming care for trans youth on Jan. 28, hospitals in Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington, Illinois, Colorado, Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York City, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., among other places, announced their intentions to either suspend or review their care; many “abruptly halted medical care for transgender people under age 19, canceling appointments and turning away patients, including some who had been receiving this care for most of their life,” according to the ACLU, a plaintiff in the case that Hurson’s court is presiding over.

The ACLU, along with Lambda Legal and the ACLU of Maryland filed a federal lawsuit on Feb. 4, on behalf of trans youth and their families whose health care had been blocked in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s order.

In Thursday’s hearing, Hurson heard arguments from plaintiffs, who requested a temporary restraining order. Plaintiffs argued the EO was “unlawful and unconstitutional” because it violates anti-discrimination laws and attempts to block funds that have already been allocated by Congress.

The government argued that the executive order was not a ban on gender affirming care, but a “general policy directive,” claiming that the plaintiffs did not yet have grounds to sue, NBC News reported.

Hurson disagreed, per NBC News:

“In this situation, it is clear that these plaintiffs have received phone calls stopping their care, stopping their appointments, stopping their everything,” Hurson said during the hearing Thursday, adding that hospitals stopped care because of the order, which also seeks to prohibit federal funding of transition-related care for minors.  

“I don’t know how you can credibly argue that this is not demanding the cessation of funding for gender affirming care,” he said.

Additionally, the executive order “seems to deny that this population even exists, or deserves to exist,” Hurson continued, according to the AP.

Lambda Legal told NBC News that they intend to request a preliminary injunction before the 14 days are up.

The Best Of TPM Today

Judicial Branch Scrambles To Limit Spillover From Trump’s Executive Branch Rampage

House GOP Makes Official Its Plan For Devastating Cuts To Medicaid

The White House Is Now Running The Justice Department

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Not Hyperbole Anymore: Musk Is In Charge of the US Government

What We Are Reading

Emil Bove Revived His Career Defending Trump. Now He’s Upending the Justice Department.

Donald Trump Jr invests in ‘steroid Olympics’

Associated Press and the White House remain in standoff over access

Latest Where Things Stand
14
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. It wouldn’t surprise me if we learned that Trump was a child who enjoyed pulling the wings off flies. He’s damaged, cruelty makes him feel big and powerful, and he DGAF who’s hurt by his lashing out.

    The guy who never had to fill out a job application for his entire life delights in taking people’s job away from them. At least the people fired on The Apprentice didn’t actually have jobs to lose, but now he must feel even more powerful taking actual jobs away from real people rather than just telling actors they’re not going to get a fake job.

  2. He just fired all probationary staff at a bunch of agencies. The Washington Post reported that thousands of young employees who were told in an email they were fired. On the same front page, there is a story that veterinarians caught bird flu but it was left out of any official CDC communications of course.

    I’d love to know what the GOP defines as over the line. Crippling and destroying the nation apparently doesn’t cut it.

  3. Trans kids who get gender-affirming care are the vast minority, and every single one of them deserves to continue this care.

    The hatred of our kids, the active attempt to erase them, this is genocide.

    If this administration has not negatively impacted your life, you are in a position of extreme privilege.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

8 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ealleniii Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for esva Avatar for darrtown Avatar for wintermoon Avatar for rickjones Avatar for carolson Avatar for ClutchCargo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: