Cheap Clothes, Climate Change, And Gen Z: A Black Friday Call For A More Sustainable Approach To Fashion

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. 

“I have nothing to wear,” I complain to my closet every morning, despite the fact that the closet is filled with rows of stacked clothes. 

Finding faults in every piece of clothing I own is a routine. Like many of my fellow Gen Zers, curating the perfectly coordinated outfit can consume hours, sometimes days, only for us to throw up our hands, arriving at the conclusion that we simply do not have enough clothes. 

Not coincidentally, fast fashion brands are rising in popularity among Gen Z consumers. The industry continues to grow, fueled by our generation’s desire to stay “drippy” and trendy. “Massive Haul” videos, created by YouTube or TikTok content creators fresh off a “successful” shopping trip, celebrate this trend — they usually feature 20–50 pieces of clothing bought at once — motivating young shoppers to buy from brands that often have insanely cheap tags, but questionable ethics. 

While we may think that a piece is cheap on the rack, the real price is paid elsewhere: in its contribution to the climate crisis. The fashion industry is among the most significant contributors to climate change today, fueled in large part by fast fashion. If Gen Z is serious that its biggest concern is climate change, our generation will need to rethink its enthusiastic relationship with these brands. 

Fast Fashion Media Bombards Us and Swells Gen Z Closets

The term “fast fashion” emerged in the 1990s to describe bands such as ZARA and Express, which employed manufacturing and designing methods that made and put clothes up for sale in less than 15 days. Cheap tags on fast fashion attracted more buyers. The brands rely on the media, fashion trends, and the perception of exclusivity to create urgency in shopping environments; they create what is known as “artificial scarcity,” telling consumers that a piece of clothing is only available for a limited time, or is a limited edition. Buyers then scramble to buy that piece, even though they may never wear it. 

Today, it’s simple economics: the supply of such clothes is increasing in part because the demand for cheap clothes is increasing, fueling a vicious cycle of overproduction and overconsumption.

While the fast fashion model has been in the U.S. for decades, social media has taken it to a whole new level. In “massive haul” videos, a content creator buys a ton of clothing at once. Often these come from fast fashion brands; influencers will spend over $300 on 30 pieces, making everything $10! They also suggest to their audience that buying dozens of clothing items in one shopping trip is normal and something we all should do. 

These “massive haul” videos enforce the idea that the more you buy, the trendier you’ll be. One such popular brand that is flaunted all over the internet is Shein: viewers of these videos see quantity and price, not quality and ethics. Influencer posts have fashion brands written all over them, making it hard for viewers not to find these things attractive. 

For Gen Z, this cycle is the day-to-day reality on social media — except many are not aware of the harm that one photo with a $10 fit, repeated many thousands of times over, begins to bring to the environment. 

Modern-day fast fashion is a direct threat to sustainability and humanity. The UN Conference on Trade and Development has stated that the fashion industry is believed to be the second most polluting industry in the world. It produces over $500 billion in waste from underutilized and not used clothing every year, and produces 20% of total global wastewater. It produces up to 10% of global carbon emissions, according to the UN — a figure that, astoundingly, is more than maritime shipping and international air travel. (Not only is fast fashion harmful to the environment, but it also often relies on a supply chain that includes cheap and exploitative labor, found in developing countries.) 

Somehow, these conversations — our reliance on fast fashion brands and our fear about our climate future — rarely overlap. I put out a call on social media for other Gen Zers who wanted to speak with me about how they deal with mainstream fast fashion and the world of  “drip or drown” slogans that motivate unethical consumption.

The Dreaded Label of ‘Outfit Repeater’ and the Pursuit of Drippiness

“Pretty much everyone I know shops fast fashion, because of how accessible it is,” says Natalia Gevara, one 23-year-old shopper I connected with. A primary driver, she says, is the common taboo among younger people of “outfit repeating,” which is exactly what it sounds like: repeating the same outfit twice, often in the same month or week. However, the term is widely used when people simply re-wear a clothing item. 

“Whenever I think about outfit repeating, I think of the Lizzie McGuire movie when Lizzie gets shamed by Kate at her graduation for being an ‘outfit repeater,’” Gevara continued. “I feel like repeating outfits as a taboo is something ingrained into us from a young age via media.” 

While the Lizzie McGuire reference comes from an early 2000s show that was, at the time, poking fun at those who criticize others for repeating an outfit, it’s become a very real fear for Gen Zers in the era of “massive haul” videos. Even though most of us are (and should be!) outfit repeaters, the shame of doing so is increasingly the reason why younger generations have embraced fast fashion.

“Haul videos on social media are the most obvious way influencers push fast fashion, but there are also subtler ways,” says Clare Ashcraft, a 19-year-old I spoke with. “For example, there’s a trend about how to dress for your body type right now that is encouraging people to change their whole wardrobes.”

The concept of “drippiness” favors micro internet trends, and since they are micro, their hype eventually fades, and so does the appeal of the product. (“Drip,” coined in hip hop, is now used by younger generations to say that a clothing item has a trendy cool appearance. If a person has a good outfit, you might say, for example, “you got drip.”)

“Our view of good style is predicated on what new micro trend is going around,” says Gevara. Micro trends, she continues, “have been one of the worst things to come from social media, every week there is a new fashion trend, inevitably everyone buys it.”

For some Gen Zers, enthusiasm for fast fashion may not be ignorance so much as resignation: They don’t think it makes much of a difference whether they buy from fast fashion brands. “I think a lot of people are at least somewhat aware of the impacts of fast fashion but are under the impression that abstaining from shopping from there will have little impact in the long run,” says Gevara.

Recognizing that the issue is one thing; taking personal and systemic steps to address it is another. That’s true of fast fashion, but also any number of other conversations on climate change: Ensuring that we all take ownership will be the only way we can combat this.

A Call for Sustainable Fashion

There’s a term for alternatives to fast fashion: “slow fashion,” which proposes ethically sourced and made clothing, that will change the fast-paced environment of fashion today. Of course, it could take years, maybe even decades to fully fix the problem we’ve started. But there are personal steps consumers can take to address and combat unethical fashion. 

First, probably the most obvious, is not shopping from these brands. (Trust me, I know it seems hard when everyone has jumped on the bandwagon! But doing this one person at a time will help reduce the overproduction by these companies.) 

Secondly, if you already own something from a fast fashion brand, don’t throw it away. In fact, never throw away your clothes. Donating items to a thrift store or charity will allow for a product to have more use, thus decreasing overconsumption. If you regularly buy from these companies look to thrift stores to find similar styles at cheaper tags. 

Changing the narrative on outfit repeating will need to be done through social media; making versatile styles acceptable will slowly change the way we think. There is so much that we can do to hold ourselves and those around us accountable, but all of us, not just Gen Z, will need to start asking more questions. Questioning where these products are made, who makes them, and what is in them is key to changing the direction we are headed.

An Incumbent Election?

I wanted to share TPM Reader JB’s take on the November 8th election, even though it’s not mine. As is so often the case, what can be valuable about a take isn’t whether it’s “right” or you agree with it, but whether it allows you to see a set of facts in a new way.

Here’s JB’s view followed by a short rejoinder with my own …

Continue reading “An Incumbent Election?”

Watch Kevin Sing, Dance, Tap …

Interesting little detail here. Back in October when Kevin McCarthy thought he’d be presiding over a big House majority he said he had yet to see any impeachable offenses committed under the Biden administration. Now the Freedom Caucusers, who hold his fate in their hands, are holding that statement over him. As CNN reporter Melanie Zanona puts it, McCarthy’s now singing a different tune. Indeed, he’ll sing, dance, do a slapstick number. McCarthy is now begging to be Speaker. I’m with Rep. Dusty Johnson (R) of South Dakota when he tells CNN that even though it’s really not clear how McCarthy pulls this off, somehow they figure he gets it done. I agree.

Continue reading “Watch Kevin Sing, Dance, Tap …”

Alaska Rep Peltola Wins Reelection

It was expected but now it’s official. Rep. Mary Peltola (D-AK) who was elected to Congress earlier this year in a special election to replace the late Rep. Don Young (R) has defeated former half-term governor Sarah Palin by the solid margin of 55% to 45%.

Peltola is the first Alaska Native woman to serve in Congress. Peltola came just shy of the 50% threshold in the first round of voting and shot up to 55% when second choices were sorted in Alaska ranked choice voting system.

Reaching Out

For some time now a number of you have been asking if I can send my Editors’ Blog posts to members by email. So I’ve decided to give it a try. Each day I’ll pick what seems to me the most meaty and important post and that will go out to members by email. Never more than one a day and not every day. But that will be the general format. Along with that post, in a simple and unadorned format, I’ll include a few links to other posts and additional sources of information that are worth your time to check out. We don’t want to send you anything you don’t want to get. So, if it’s not for you, there’s a clear link at the bottom of each email that allows you to change your email preferences to not get any emails from the Editors’ Blog. Try not to do a general unsubscribe because, if you do, we can’t send you any updates about TPM events or important things going on at the site.

Continue reading “Reaching Out”

Where Things Stand: Pence Rebuffed Jan 6 Panel But Is Open To Considering DOJ Testimony

The Justice Department wants to question former veep Mike Pence as part of its criminal probe into Donald Trump’s efforts to stay in power after the 2020 election, two people familiar with the matter told the New York Times in a piece published this afternoon. Pence is reportedly considering the request, breaking from his outright refusal to cooperate with the House Jan. 6 Select Committee’s probe into the matter.

A DOJ investigator reached out to Pence’s team before Attorney General Merrick Garland announced on Friday that he was appointing Jack Smith as special counsel to oversee and weigh charges in the DOJ’s criminal probe into Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, as well as the department’s classified records case.

Continue reading “Where Things Stand: Pence Rebuffed Jan 6 Panel But Is Open To Considering DOJ Testimony”

Georgia Supreme Court Unanimously Blocks GOP Attempt To Nix Day Of Early Runoff Voting

The Georgia Supreme Court, unanimously and without commentary, shot down Republicans’ attempt to bar a day of early voting in the Senate runoff between Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and Herschel Walker. 

Continue reading “Georgia Supreme Court Unanimously Blocks GOP Attempt To Nix Day Of Early Runoff Voting”

Arizona AG Candidate Denies 2022 Election Results With Trumped-Up Lawsuit

Yet another Republican candidate for office in Arizona is refusing to accept his loss—or, in this case, a recount.

Republican attorney general candidate Abe Hamadeh filed a lawsuit—with backing from the Republican National Committee—on Tuesday contesting the results of his race against Democratic opponent Kris Mayes, who’s currently leading in the final tally by 510 votes.

Mayes’ lead was slim enough to trigger an automatic recount in the state, but that wasn’t enough for Hamadeh: The former prosecutor is asking the State Superior Court in Maricopa County to overturn the results (which he believes to be fraudulent because of … printer issues) and name him the winner.

Continue reading “Arizona AG Candidate Denies 2022 Election Results With Trumped-Up Lawsuit”

Dispatch #2: Collision

Coming out of the 2022 midterms, conventional wisdom pointed to one lesson for the GOP: Voters didn’t like Big Lie MAGA Republicans. The Big Lie and MAGA have become all but indistinguishable. But to the extent they are distinguishable, if you came to the game on the back of a Trump endorsement, you probably didn’t fare well in 2022. The best example are all those Big Lie secretary of state candidates in swing states. Every last one of them lost. That and related defeats are what has given rivals in the GOP at least an opening to challenge Trump for leadership of the party. After years when he could make or break anyone in the GOP, in 2022 Trump looked like an electoral loser. Conventional wisdom is usually most noteworthy for what it misses. But the signal here was so strong as to be undeniable: Trump had a stranglehold on the GOP. But in a general election his embrace was toxic, except in solidly red states.

Continue reading “Dispatch #2: Collision”

McCarthy Is Still Hemorrhaging Speaker Votes Even As He Bends Over Backwards For MAGA

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) announced he would not vote for House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) for speaker next year, joining the small but mighty chorus of MAGA-aligned detractors in his caucus who are refusing to bend the knee – at least not before throwing a minor fit. 

Continue reading “McCarthy Is Still Hemorrhaging Speaker Votes Even As He Bends Over Backwards For MAGA”