GenBioPro, the maker of generic mifepristone, made a bid to establish a backstop Wednesday, should the Supreme Court decide to restrict one of its primary products.
Continue reading “Mifepristone Maker Tries To Establish Safety Net In Case Supreme Court Restricts The Drug”Oklahoma Commissioner Resigns After Getting Caught Discussing Attacking Black People
A county commissioner in Oklahoma has resigned after he was caught on tape alongside other local officials joking about killing local newspaper reporters and lynching Black people, the governor announced Wednesday.
Continue reading “Oklahoma Commissioner Resigns After Getting Caught Discussing Attacking Black People”Supreme Court Extends Pause On Mifepristone Rulings
The Supreme Court extended its stay on lower court rulings on mifepristone until Friday just before midnight, meaning that the drug will remain accessible and available at least until then.
Continue reading “Supreme Court Extends Pause On Mifepristone Rulings”The Fox Suit in the Media Press
I wanted to address a separate issue about the Fox settlement. Through this process what we might call the glitz media press was quite skeptical both of the strength of Dominion’s suit and what it meant for press freedoms generally. I noted some of this last month from the two media reporters from Puck News, Dylan Byers and Eriq Gardner. But they’re extreme examples of a general phenomenon.
The general point is that media reporters don’t seem terribly well versed on media law. There was some pretty basic lack of knowledge about the key elements of defamation law. The general reason for that is that most glitz media journalism focuses on a mix of personalities and the business of journalism. And in this case by the business of journalism I mean acquisitions and mergers of the big conglomerates, market fluctuations and so forth. There are lots of media reporters who know the legal stuff cold. But they don’t tend to be the category of reporters I’m talking about here. They’re writing in the digital equivalent of what were once called the ‘small magazines’ or in the niche media press.
In those pieces I noted above Byers and Gardner treated reports that Fox was in a dire situation as a sort of liberal fanfic, untethered to the reality of the situation. But what struck me more than the poor legal analysis was the general sense that those who hoped for Fox to gets comeuppance were either naive about or indifferent to press freedom generally.
Continue reading “The Fox Suit in the Media Press”WH Slams Senate GOP For Blocking Feinstein’s Request To Be Temporarily Replaced
The White House slammed Senate Republicans on Tuesday for refusing to approve a request to temporarily replace Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) on the Judicial Committee, a request Feinstein made personally so she could have more time to recover from an illness.
Continue reading “WH Slams Senate GOP For Blocking Feinstein’s Request To Be Temporarily Replaced”Trump Swipes More Florida GOP Endorsements From DeSantis
Former president Donald Trump has procured more endorsements from Florida’s congressional delegation a week after Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) specifically asked Florida GOPers not to do that.
Continue reading “Trump Swipes More Florida GOP Endorsements From DeSantis”What About Fox and Dominion? Did Fox Get Off Easy?
I’m seeing a lot of mixed opinions about the Fox/Dominion settlement. Mostly, I agree with David’s sum-up and response. To the extent you’re disappointed or feel like Fox got away with it, your expectations were unrealistic. Dominion’s a private company. It’s in the business of being in business and making money, not saving American democracy.
It’s genuinely difficult to comprehend the magnitude of the financial settlement: upwards of a billion dollars. Someone asked me yesterday if it were the biggest defamation settlement in history. I noticed a few reports basically hedging on this point, calling it likely the biggest settlement ever. But I think that’s mostly because it’s hard to prove a negative on the fly. I’m not sure there’s ever been a pay out even a 10th the size. (Mammoth verdicts are often trimmed down or tossed entirely on appeal.)
I’m also surprised that there was no admission of error, let alone an apology — we’ll get to that in a moment. But the reality is that the discovery process itself was a devastating verdict on Fox’s lack of any journalistic principles as a news organization. And the galactic size of the settlement really speaks for itself.
Continue reading “What About Fox and Dominion? Did Fox Get Off Easy?”Feds Accuse Kremlin Of Backing Bizarre Influence Ops In US
Every few months now, the Justice Department alleges a new scheme to influence U.S. politics or curry favor with the influential.
Continue reading “Feds Accuse Kremlin Of Backing Bizarre Influence Ops In US”Buck Up! Fox News Just Took A Devastating Hit For The Ages
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo.
This Was Total Vindication
I’m a bit surprised by the unrealistic expectations so many people apparently harbored about the Dominion case. The bombshell revelations in the case about the internal workings of Fox News and the three-quarters of a billion dollars the network is being forced to pay exceeded my expectations for what a civil action could achieve. It’s a breathtaking success!
It is a landmark defamation case that will be studied for years. It cements in the historical record Fox’s sinister role in Donald Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election. It confirms and illustrates in vivid detail Fox’s key role in fomenting the reactionary, caustic, democracy-backsliding political era from the 1990s into the 2020s.
So enough with the long faces:
- The Fox settlement ranks as the second highest defamation award in U.S. legal history, behind only the Sandy Hook families’ $1 billion-plus in judgments against Alex Jones last year.
- It’s the largest ever U.S. defamation settlement (as opposed to judgment), at least that’s been publicly revealed.
- The judge had already ruled that it was “CRYSTAL clear” that Fox aired false claims about Dominion. All the trial would have done was establish whether Fox acted knowingly or recklessly in doing so and how much Dominion’s damages should be.
- Dominion marshaled extensive evidence of Fox’s wrongdoing and was able to inject that into the public sphere via its stupendous motion for summary judgment a few weeks ago.
Perhaps instead of sitting back and waiting and hoping for third parties – like a judge or a jury or some grand duke of truth-telling in the universe – to validate our own judgments about Fox News, everyone in the reality-based world can simply rest confident in those judgments, shout them from the rooftops on their own merits, and proceed knowing what we know to be true based on voluminous evidence and our own good sense.
Politics generally – and the movement to protect and secure democracy specifically – isn’t a spectator sport, and it’s a fundamental mistake to treat it that way. This is a good bracing thread on keeping expectations reasonable:
A Settlement Was Not A Surprise
A lot of the initial coverage yesterday suggested the settlement was a surprise development. It really wasn’t. Most cases settle. Yes, the size of the payout was astonishing and the circumstances were undoubtedly dramatic. And while settlement wasn’t a guaranteed outcome, it was an eminently plausible one, especially after the previous 48 hours:
- Settlement talks had heated up as trial approached, which is super common in civil litigation. The delay of the start of the trial on Monday to try to resolve the case signaled that the settlement talks were serious.
- The $787.5 million settlement came after the jury was selected but before opening statements, during a long pause in the courtroom proceedings that suggested settlement talks were continuing.
- A mediator was brought in the help get the two sides over the finish line, the WSJ reports: “The parties engaged a mediator from dispute-resolution provider JAMS, Jerry Roscoe, who was on vacation in Romania and worked over the course of a day to bring about a deal Tuesday afternoon, according to a person familiar with the situation.”
- The terms of the settlement do not require Fox News Fox to apologize or admit to wrongdoing on air.
- The closest Fox came to an admission was this weak sauce: “we acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false.”
- Fox continues to traffic in ridiculously self-serving claptrap: “This settlement reflects Fox’s continued commitment to the highest journalistic standards.”
If your ideal scenario involved Fox News personalities and the Murdochs being forced to testify and getting chewed up on cross examination with a gargantuan verdict and punitive damages in the billions, I get you. But that was not even close to a guaranteed outcome of going to trial. Also possible: the jury awards a more modest judgment, Dominion outright loses at trial, Dominion wins but later loses key issues on appeal and has to start over, etc. In any of these also-plausible alternative scenarios, Fox would have had the opportunity to further muddy the waters. In your imagined schadenfreude-rich universe, bad things could have happened, too.
Why Wasn’t Fox Forced To Admit Wrongdoing And Apologize?
This is more of a question than a theory: How much did the separate looming $2.7 billion defamation claim by Smartmatic USA constrain Fox’s ability to admit wrongdoing and apologize as part of the Dominion settlement?
Smartmatic’s claims in its New York state lawsuit aren’t the same as Dominion’s, but they closely mirror the fact pattern in the Dominion case.
“Dominion’s litigation exposed some of the misconduct and damage caused by Fox’s disinformation campaign. Smartmatic will expose the rest,” an attorney for Smartmatic said in a statement after the Dominion settlement.
Look Out, Rudy!
Don’t forget that Dominion still has viable defamation cases pending against Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, MyPillow chief executive Mike Lindell, and Overstock.com founder Patrick Byrne, and against Newsmax and OAN.
How Fox Covered It
The Fox News settlement was big news everywhere except Fox News.
No Special Master?!?
This was my one disappointment about the Dominion v. Fox settlement.
After appointing a special master Tuesday morning to investigate Fox’s alleged withholding of evidence from Dominion as he had promised, the judge reportedly called it off after the settlement. To be slightly more precise, NBC News, citing a source familiar, reported that `”the special master’s investigation will not move forward.” But that would only be the case if the judge said so.
Why am I disappointed? Any misconduct by Fox during the pre-trial phase isn’t forgiven or excused because a settlement was later reached. The integrity of the judicial process is at stake, especially as Fox is engaged in multiple other related or similar lawsuits arising from the same pattern of conduct.
What Is Fani Willis Up To?
A curious development yesterday in the Georgia state criminal investigation into Trump’s election subversion effort:
- Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is seeking to disqualify a defense lawyer, Kimberly Bourroughs Debrow, from simultaneously representing 10 fake electors.
- Willis says some of the fake elector witnesses are accusing another fake elector witness of additional wrongdoing, which Willis claims puts the defense lawyer in an untenable ethical position.
- Willis also accused the defense lawyer and her co-counsel of not passing on an offer of immunity to some of their clients and then misleading the court about it.
- The defense lawyer and one of her co-counsel vigorously denied Willis’ claims.
‘Cheese-Eating Rat!’
Prosecutors took an unusual tack and asked a defense witness on the stand in a Jan. 6 rioter case to identify other people who entered the Capitol that day but haven’t been charged. The defense lawyer lost his mind and told the court that prosecutors were trying to turn the witness into a “cheese-eating rat.” The judge offered a compromise solution.
Another Election Official Quits Under Duress
NYT: “Heider Garcia, the head of elections in Tarrant County, Texas, announced this week that he would resign after facing death threats, joining other beleaguered election officials across the nation who have quit under similar circumstances.”
Abortion Pill Expected From SCOTUS Today
The Supreme Court’s temporary pause on the abortion pill ruling out of Texas ends at midnight ET tonight, so a fuller decision from the high court is expected sometime today. TPM’s Kate Riga is on the case.
Discord Leaker To Appear in Court
Airman Jack Teixeira, accused of dumping classified documents on Discord, is scheduled to appear today in federal court in Boston for a detention hearing. We may get more evidence from prosecutors at the hearing.
What Now For Feinstein?
Senate Democrats failed in their unrealistic bid to convince Republicans to help them replace Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) on the Judiciary Committee and resume confirming Biden judges.
I Take That As A No?
Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!
Where Things Stand: Didn’t Know Florida Could Be So Cold
Two more Republican members of Florida’s congressional delegation have completely ignored Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ plea to hold off on endorsing Donald Trump while he tricks absolutely no one into thinking he’s still mulling a presidential election.
Reps. Greg Steube and John Rutherford announced this week that they’re throwing their weight behind the other Florida resident’s 2024 bid, both issuing Trump endorsements dripping with MAGA flair.
Continue reading “Where Things Stand: Didn’t Know Florida Could Be So Cold”