For the Trump Administration, The Enemy is Everywhere

Hello it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️

The Crisis Factory

The White House on Thursday held a roundtable that brought together the national leadership of federal law enforcement agencies with a group of right-wing Youtube streamers and social media influencers. The topic was Antifa, and the mood was a mix of aggression and paranoia.

“I’m attacked every time I do my job. When I leave my house to go to work, I’m violently assaulted,” said Cam Higby, a Turning Point USA staffer. “I’ve had guns pulled on me. I’ve been bear-sprayed. I’ve been beaten down. I’ve been almost killed.”

Higby and others spent more than an hour discussing Antifa, its origins, and its supposed encroachment on nearly every aspect of American life. What it really demonstrated was the call-and-response dynamic that exists between extremely online far-right influencers and senior administration officials. 

Pro-Trump reporter Nick Sortor recounted being briefly detained by local law enforcement in Portland; Attorney General Pam Bondi replied that she and DOJ Civil Rights Division leader Harmeet Dhillon opened a “pattern and practice investigation” into the Portland PD in response. Trump asked Higby at one point to name the cable news network that treats Antifa opponents the worst; after Higby said MSNBC, Trump remarked that Comcast CEO Brian Roberts “allows that to happen.”

That dynamic carries through to the administration’s current attempt to fulfill plans that Trump has expressed since his 2016 presidential run: maximizing federal power to use as a cudgel against political opponents, trampling over safeguards that long prevented federal law enforcement and other functions from being used for partisan ends.

It still remains largely unnoticed by the mainstream press, but civil liberties advocates increasingly point to NSPM-7, a national security directive issued last month, as one of the administration’s most aggressive moves to clamp down on political opponents to date. It tells federal law enforcement and the Treasury Department to investigate and consider charging people who contribute to groups that express such common sentiments as “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity.”

As many have noted, it’s very difficult to pull off this kind of power grab in the absence of a true emergency. In the world that administration officials are trying to create, Antifa is that crisis — a threat so pressing that it justifies exceptional measures that give senior officials broad sway to pursue political opponents.

And yet the whole setup, as grave a threat as it may pose to civil liberties, remains very slapstick. At one point during the roundtable, Trump was asked if he was considering whether to suspend habeas corpus “to not only deal with these insurrectionists across the nation, but also to continue rapidly deporting illegal aliens.”

“Suspending who?” he replied, before handing it off to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. She said she hadn’t been a part of any conversations about it.

— Josh Kovensky

Here is what else we have on tap.

  • Congressional Republicans are casting a coming “No Kings” protest as a “hate America rally.”
  • As the shutdown drags on, a handful of Republicans are wondering if they should just blow up the filibuster after all.
  • What Olympian Caster Semenya taught TPM’s publisher about the perils of “common sense.”

TPM is Turning 25! 

Join us at the Metrograph Theater in Manhattan on Thursday 11/6 for a live recording of the Josh Marshall Podcast Featuring Kate Riga and an oral history of TPM with some esteemed alums.

Weekender subscribers can get 33% OFF ticket prices using discount code WEEKENDER at this link

To Republicans, All Liberal Protesters Are Terrorists Now

It’s gotten lost amid the escalation of state violence, but the Republican conflation of “protester” and “terrorist” from what was recently thought of as a more responsible wing of the party has caught my attention. 

Both Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) — the latter of whom never made gains in the speakership race to replace Kevin McCarthy because he condemned the Jan. 6 insurrecxtion — have referred to the No Kings protest scheduled for 10/18 as a “hate America rally.” 

Johnson said that “pro-Hamas” people and “antifa” would be in attendance, while Emmer thundered that it would appease the “terrorist wing” of the Democratic Party. 

At best, this kind of rhetoric is wildly irresponsible and a sign of how hostile to peaceful protesters the party has become. At worst, it’s an incitement of violence.

— Kate Riga

Some Republicans are Suddenly A Little Bit Anti-Filibuster

It’s day 11 of the government shutdown. There’s no resolution in sight to get Congress out of the deadlock and reopen the federal government.

On Friday federal workers received a partial paycheck for their work up until Oct. 1, when the shutdown began. Some workers, the administration promised, would be also receive notice that they had been laid off, a move one federal employees union has challenged in court. Members of the military are expected to miss their first paycheck on Oct. 15 if Republicans don’t act. 

Meanwhile, a couple of congressional Republicans — including Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) — have mused this week about ending the filibuster in order to pass the continuing resolution and temporarily fund the government without needing Senate Democrats’ votes.

“My point of view would be this: We have almost all Republicans on board,” Moreno told Fox News. “Maybe it’s time to think about the filibuster. You say look, the Democrats would have done it. Let’s just vote with Republicans. We got 52 Republicans. Let’s go. And let’s open the government. It may get to that.” 

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) shot down that idea repeatedly this week. 

“Super-majority requirement is something that makes the Senate the Senate,” Thune said at a Friday news conference. “And honestly, if we had done that, there’s a whole lot of bad things that could have been done by the other side. The 60-vote threshold has protected this country.” 

Thune added the filibuster has been “a voice for the minority.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) seems to agree with that sentiment.

“Is it possible? Yes … Is it wise? A lot of people would tell you it’s not,” Johnson told reporters this week. “I mean, on the Republican side, I would be deeply concerned if the Democrats had a bare majority in the Senate right now.”

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats continue to hold the line, reiterating their main ask — that Obamacare subsidies, which are set to expire at the end of the year, be extended — on a daily basis and condemning Republicans for not coming to the negotiating table.

“Donald Trump’s strategy during this government shutdown that he has created has been to play golf and issue deepfake videos,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said during his Friday press conference. “Mike Johnson’s strategy is to keep House Republicans on vacation. John Thune’s strategy is to continue to do the same partisan thing over and over and over again and expect different results. That’s legislative insanity.”

— Emine Yücel

Caster Semenya and the Illusion of Common Sense

In 2019, Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya was banned from international track and field competitions. The ban stems from her refusal to take medicine that would artificially lower her hormone levels to those more commonly found in women. The new regulations had been announced by the International Association of Athletics Federations in April of 2018. Semenya announced in June of 2018 that she would file a legal challenge to the rules.

The ban effectively ended Semenya’s career. 

This month, in an email to the Associated Press, Semenya’s attorney said that she would be ending her legal fight. Now 34, the 2012 and 2016 Olympic gold medalist has shifted from athlete to coach. Though Semenya never got the outcome she hoped for, she goes out on something of a high note. In July, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Semenya had not gotten a fair hearing in a previous court proceeding.

Semenya’s story is long and complicated, and I don’t have the space to chronicle the entire thing. But here are the facts: She and her family have maintained since the very beginning that she was born a woman and that her birth certificate says she is a woman. She has never identified as anything else. She has eschewed the label intersex. In a 2023 New York Times essay that I strongly encourage everyone to read, she said:

I know I look like a man. I know I sound like a man and maybe even walk like a man and dress like one, too. But I’m not a man; I’m a woman. Playing sports and having muscles and a deep voice make me less feminine, yes. I’m a different kind of woman, I know, but I’m still a woman.

Semenya says that she found out during a medical exam when she was 18 years old that she had XY chromosomes, as opposed to the typically female XX, and elevated levels of testosterone due to undescended testis that she didn’t know she had. She was told that in order to compete she could have surgery to remove the testis, or she could take estrogen pills to lower the testosterone. She took the pills for a while to compete, but upon learning of another athlete — Indian runner Dutee Chand — who had challenged the rule in court and won, Semenya threw her pills in the trash. The IAAF then came back with even more strict regulations — requiring a testosterone level even lower than the one she previously struggled to meet.

I first learned about Caster Semenya from a 2009 article in The New Yorker. In the article, Ariel Levy lays out Semenya’s story at the intersection of race and gender political issues. As a Black South African, Semenya and those close to her are no strangers to Europeans coming in and trying to explain how biology supposedly works. Apartheid-era census takers often told people they were a different race than they had previously believed themselves to be. As Levy writes: 

In 1985, according to the census, more than a thousand people somehow changed race: nineteen whites turned Colored (as South Africans call people of mixed heritage); seven hundred and two Coloreds turned white, fifty Indians turned Colored, eleven Colored turned Chinese, and so on. (No blacks turned white, or vice versa.)

This article had a profound effect on how I, then 21 years old, viewed the world. I’d never encountered anyone like Semenya before. Race as a social construct? Sure, of course. This was established. But biological sex being anything other than binary was new to me. It forced me to rethink how I organized and understood the world. It’s not as nice and neat as I thought. There’s a lot of gray. Things are fuzzy. As we learn more about how things work, the divisions that seem so obvious or common-sensical fade away and are replaced by spectrums. It’s often said there are no straight lines in nature. Well, there are also very few discrete distinctions. 

These lessons are intrinsic, too, to our politics and the way in which we organize society. Again, Semenya is not a trans person, though it’s impossible not to view the fight over trans rights as related. Both deal with a government or aspects of a government, attempting to codify biological terms according to “common sense” understandings. I think in many ways what people like Semenya and what trans people help us to consider is the possibility that our conceptual understanding of a very basic building block in our construction of society — gender and sex identity — is not terribly sound. And if that foundational pillar crumbles, what’s next?

These sorts of conceptual revolutions happen from time to time. People get pretty mad because they don’t like change. Just when you think you have a grip on things, someone comes along and says that, actually, the Earth rotates around the sun, not vice versa. Some people who illuminate these truths for the rest of us are made to suffer by those who’ve grown comfortable in the darkness. Caster Semenya is one of those people, and it makes me sad. But she changed the whole course of my life — and so the least I could do as her career as an athlete comes to a close is pass her story along.

— Joe Ragazzo

New Mass Layoffs?

You’ve probably seen that Russ Vought went on Twitter today and said “the RIFS [government speak for permanent layoffs] have begun.” Obviously, I can’t know directly what this means or what they’re doing. But since I’ve written about this a few times, I thought I should share my reaction. I remain skeptical that this is actually happening in a substantial way.

It could totally be happening. But I think the driver here is that Trump was getting hit increasingly hard for having flinched on this threat. And as of yesterday, they started backing off on the threat not to pay backpay to federal workers. So I think the press about this was getting to the White House and both angering Trump and making them look like they’re flailing. I would say I’m certain that this is why they’re doing this (reaction to that bad press). The only question is whether they’re actually going to follow through to really undo that impression.

Continue reading “New Mass Layoffs?”

Stephen Miller Has ‘Central Role’ Probing Liberal Groups

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

Criminalizing Political Opposition in America

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller is “playing a central role” in the Trump administration’s lawless investigation of liberal groups and their finances, White House officials told Reuters:

Miller is taking a “hands-on” role in investigating the funding of nonprofits and educational institutions and is sharing recommendations from Attorney General Pam Bondi and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent with Trump and other top advisers, the first White House official said.

The official said Miller is Trump’s chief adviser on the issue and is receiving regular updates from the joint terrorism task force – a coalition of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies tasked with investigating terrorism.

As TPM’s Josh Kovensky reported earlier this week, the threat of baseless federal investigations under the spurious umbrella of “domestic terrorism” is already having an effect on advocacy groups exercising their First Amendment rights.

Stephen Miller’s Hit List

The White House provided Reuters with a list of “liberal groups, donors or fundraising organizations that it said helped finance or plan protests where the violent incidents occurred”:

  • George Soros’ Open Society Foundations
  • ActBlue
  • Indivisible
  • Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights
  • IfNotNow
  • Jewish Voice for Peace

One White House official “stressed that the organizations were not necessarily potential targets,” Reuters reported.

President Trump has previously targeted Soros and Reid Hoffman by name.

Bonkers Antifa Meeting at the White House

As part of targeting political opposition groups for investigation, the Trump White House held an anti-antifa themed meeting this week that really was bonkers, as the Independent captures well: “Trump just hosted an ‘Antifa roundtable’ at the White House. It was so much worse than you’re imagining”

Trump Gets His Letitia James Indictment

The lawless indictment of Letitia James was so highly anticipated that the event itself seemed anticlimactic, which is one of the challenges of our time.

After the president threatens the target for years, campaigns for re-election on exacting retribution against the target, orders an indictment of the target, ousts a prosecutor for not following orders, and installs his supine personal lawyer as prosecutor, then there’s an air of inevitability about the subsequent indictment.

But as Garrett Graff noted this week before the James indictment, that is the problem: “The fact that it’s possible to predict the next target — presidential rantings indicate that it could be John Bolton, Letitia James or Adam Schiff — shows how corrupted this usually independent process has become.”

Magistrate Judge Rejects End-Run Indictment

A remarkable ruling by Magistrate Zia Faruqui in D.C. rejected a Trump DOJ effort to do an end-run around a federal grand jury that had already declined to issue an indictment in an assault and weapons case.

Faruqui had called out DOJ attorneys immediately when they went to a D.C. Superior Court grand jury, secured an indictment there, and then tried to present it in federal court, but he ordered briefing before issuing a ruling. In the meantime, DOJ ran to Chief Judge James Boasberg and asked him to overrule Faruqui, but Boasberg declined to intervene prior to the briefing and an actual ruling from Faruqui.

Faruqui ruled Thursday, and it was a doozy:

Between the year 2005 and today, over 5,000 indictments were returned in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Last week, the government attempted—for the first time ever—to return an indictment from a D.C. Superior Court grand jury after a federal grand jury previously refused to indict. This unprecedented workaround to the normal federal grand jury process immediately raised serious questions about the legality of the government’s conduct.

From there, Faruqui conducted his legal analysis, but not without dropping a few pointed barbs at the Trump DOJ:

The unprecedented number of recent federal grand jury rejections—a trend that appears to be spreading as most recently seen in Chicago—reflects that federal grand juries want more than the government is offering.

Faruqui — who has been at the leading edge of scrutinizing Trump DOJ conduct, including overcharging criminal cases in D.C. federal court — wasn’t done yet:

Under their view, the government could take all federal indictments to D.C. Superior Court without any limitations. That outcome is something to be especially vigilant against given the recent struggles of the government to bend federal grand juries to the government’s will.

Faruqui’s conclusion was withering (emphasis his):

This litigation and the delay caused by it could have been avoided if the government had simply gone to one of the other federal grand juries. That escape hatch remains open today. At any time, the government can short circuit this dispute by taking their federal charge before a federal grand jury. The question then is why are they now afraid to do so?

DOJ is likely to appeal to Boasberg again. Stay tuned.

A Mixed Bag From Courts on National Guard Deployments

Federal courts offered conflicting signals Thursday over whether they will rein in Trump’s National Guard deployments to blue states:

  • Oregon: 9th Circuit judges reviewing Trump’s Portland deployment “enthusiastically support his ability to deploy military anywhere at any time,” TPM’s Kate Riga reports.
  • Illinois: U.S. District Judge April M. Perry issued a temporary restraining order blocking Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in the Chicago area.

Quote of the Day

“Oklahomans would lose their mind if Pritzker in Illinois sent troops down to Oklahoma during the Biden administration.” –Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, the chairman of the National Governors Association

Only The Best People

Not skeevy at all, via Politico:

In late July, Paul Ingrassia, the White House liaison for the Department of Homeland Security, arrived at a Ritz-Carlton in Orlando with a lower-ranking female colleague and others from their department. When the group reached the front desk, the woman learned she didn’t have a hotel room.

Ingrassia then informed her that she would be staying with him, according to five administration officials familiar with the episode. Eventually the woman discovered that Ingrassia had arranged ahead of time to have her hotel room canceled so she would have to stay with him, three of those officials said.

Ingrassia’s attorney confirmed the two shared a room but denied that any last-minute change was made to the hotel reservation or that any “inappropriate behavior” took place.

Making Sense of the Israel-Gaza Deal

Aaron David Miller is as astute and reliable a Middle East observer as we have, and his interview this week in the New Yorker on how and why a ceasefire deal finally came together is the best expert analysis I’ve seen.

‘Starving Children Screaming for Food’

I feel some measure of remorse for not mentioning every damn day the unfolding disaster of Trump’s lawless foreign aid cuts. Just a couple of examples from this week:

  • AP: Starving children screaming for food as US aid cuts unleash devastation and death across Myanma
  • WaPo: U.S. aid cuts are being felt across Africa. Here’s where.

Help Us Celebrate TPM’s 25th Anniversary!

Unbelievably, TPM turns 25 next month.

Born as a blog in the cauldron of the 2000 Florida recount, reinvented in the aughts as a digital news site, reimagined in the teens as a membership-based business model, and chugging through the ’20s in the best financial shape it’s ever been in, TPM has evolved together with you through an incredibly tumultuous time in U.S. politics and publishing.

It’s a lot for us to celebrate as a company, as a team, and as a community. To mark the occasion, we have a two-day extravaganza planned in NYC for Nov. 6-7. Tickets for both nights are on sale now.

I sincerely hope Morning Memo readers can join us for the big celebration. Some of you have been along for the entire 25-year ride, but a significant share of Morning Memo readers have come aboard more recently during the crucible of the Trump II presidency. To make newcomers feel more welcome and open the doors to the TPM community as widely as possible, I’m offering Morning Memo readers a special rate for tickets to the live show on Thursday, Nov. 6. Use the code “MorningMemo” at checkout and get 33% off. Click here now to get your live show tickets.

I hope to see you at either the live show or the big party the next night — or BOTH! Please say hi and let me know you’re a Morning Memo reader.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Trump Meets a Friendly Audience in Court as He Seeks To Deploy Military Wherever He Wants

Thursday saw dueling hearings related to President Trump’s push to deploy National Guard troops in blue states that don’t want them there. 

Continue reading “Trump Meets a Friendly Audience in Court as He Seeks To Deploy Military Wherever He Wants”

War Zone Coverage

We’ve always been very cautious about doing any reporting from war zones. But here’s a report from TPM Reader TB

I am assuming (or hoping) that TPM has received reports from others here in Portland regarding the huge gulf between the way the Administration is describing things and what is happening in reality. Either way, I feel compelled to share my observations because I am completely flabbergasted that the Administration continues to so blatantly manufacture this “warzone” imagery. I’m used to the hyperbole they use, but this goes so far beyond hyperbole, I can barely find the words.

Continue reading “War Zone Coverage”

9th Circuit Trump Judges Enthusiastically Support His Ability To Deploy Military Anywhere At Any Time

9th Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson argued so vehemently Thursday that President Trump has the power to deploy the National Guard into unwilling states on very little pretext that one suspects the arguments were doubling as his Supreme Court audition. 

Continue reading “9th Circuit Trump Judges Enthusiastically Support His Ability To Deploy Military Anywhere At Any Time”

Has Trump Brought Peace to Gaza?

Has Trump brought peace to Gaza? Ended the war and cycle of killing that has now been going on for two years? I’ve had a number of TPM Readers ask me different versions of this. And in those questions is a lurking undercurrent, sometimes more or less explicit, of “does this malevolent clown actually get credit for this?” I wanted to address this question. And my answer is that this is perhaps the first time when Trump’s frequent and degenerate boast — I alone can do it — has a very real element of truth.

I don’t think Trump expended any great amount of energy over this and I don’t think he really cares greatly about any of the people on either side of the conflict. Let’s remember that a few months ago he backed a plan to “voluntarily” depopulate Gaza and remake it as a series of mediterranean resorts, sort of Monaco only 150 times the size.

Continue reading “Has Trump Brought Peace to Gaza?”

Greg Bovino Emerges as Trump’s Man For Conjuring Up a Blue-City Insurrection

Elected officials, activists, and at least one former high-ranking Department of Homeland Security official have all noticed the same thing: when the Trump administration wants to turn up the heat, they send in Gregory Bovino. 

Continue reading “Greg Bovino Emerges as Trump’s Man For Conjuring Up a Blue-City Insurrection”

Bondi’s Wedding Ring Made Trump Bleed … and Other DOJ Absurdities

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

The Comic Horror of the Trump DOJ

Before we get into the substantive coverage of developments related to the Trump Justice Department, a quick foray into the absurdism that is never far from the surface.

Thanks to a notebook dump by WSJ reporters in a story ostensibly about the politicization of the Justice Department under the thumb of the Trump White House, we have a bunch of new nuggets that are equal parts cringey and preposterous.

There was the time earlier this year, for instance, when President Trump cut his hand on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s gaudy wedding ring. I can’t even with this story. That and the other lowlights of the WSJ story:

  • Say what you want about disgraced Attorney General John Mitchell, but he never made Richard Nixon’s hand bleed with his wedding ring (so far as we know):

Trump occasionally reminds aides about an incident last year in which Trump cut his hand on Bondi’s large wedding ring, causing him to bleed.

  • Officials confirmed that Trump’s social media post demanding that Bondi hurry up and indict former FBI Director Jim Comey already was meant to be a direct message to her and not intended to put her on public blast:

Trump believed he had sent Bondi the message directly, addressing it to “Pam,” and was surprised to learn it was public, the officials said. Bondi grew upset and called White House aides and Trump, who then agreed to send a second post praising Bondi as doing a “GREAT job.” 

  • No story on the absurdist Trump DOJ is complete without a cameo from Ed Martin:

He works from an office dubbed the “Freedom Suite” on one end of a hallway on the deputy attorney general’s fourth floor, which visitors have described as being decorated with oversize photos of Trump and a small cup of holy water on the wall. 

As with all things in the Trump era, the absurdism is an inextricable part of the corruption, retribution, and destruction. As historically significant as the ruination of the Justice Department is and as seriously as we must take it, it’s important to remember it’s been gutted by clowns and imbeciles. Absurdly.

Now on to the Substance of the WSJ Report …

More substantive nuggets from the WSJ story on the politically motivated retribution prosecutions:

  • Federal prosecutors in Maryland are “expected in coming days” to charge former Trump national security adviser turned Trump critic John Bolton with mishandling classified information, the paper reported, citing sources familiar with the matter.
  • Former FBI Director Christopher Wray, a relatively recent target of Trump’s ire, is now under full-blown investigation, though for exactly what is not clear: “Former officials have received subpoenas in recent days in the Wray inquiry, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.”
  • Federal Housing Finance Agency director Bill Pulte, who has ginned up the mortgage fraud allegations against New York Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), went farther than previously reported in getting the bogus allegations in front of Trump: “This summer, Pulte visited the White House and gave Trump an elaborate presentation with visuals that included why the New York attorney general should be charged.”

Comey Pleads Not Guilty

During the arraignment of former FBI Director Jim Comey on politicized charges of lying to Congress, his attorney previewed the main pre-trial challenges he will raise to the indictment.

As expected, former Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, a longtime Comey friend and now his attorney, will zero in on the unusual circumstances surrounding the indictment and on President Trump’s questionable appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.

The four areas of attack Fitzgerald outlined:

With Fitzgerald complaining that the bare-bones indictment left him guessing about the identities of key figures in the government’s case, I’d expect him to eventually file a motion for a bill of particulars, a more fact-specific rendering of the indictment.

The two line prosecutors brought in from North Carolina to help Halligan with the case — because prosecutors in her own office have largely washed their hands of it — are still getting up to speed on discovery, an unusual position to be in post-indictment. “We feel that, in this case, the cart has been placed before the horse,” Fitzgerald said during the arraignment. “My client doesn’t want to wait around while they look for things.”

Fitzgerald told U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, a Biden appointee, that he had not had substantive contact with prosecutors about the case until Tuesday afternoon.

Nachmanoff set an aggressive but not crazy initial schedule for pre-trial motions. It’s almost inevitable that those deadlines will get pushed back, but this district is notorious for its rocket docket, so the case is not likely to linger.

Still, Comey’s challenge to Halligan’s appointment will have to be heard by a judge from outside the district because she displaced the prior interim U.S. attorney who had been appointed by the judges of the district, creating a conflict of interest. So that may slow things down a bit.

Kash Patel Fires 2 FBI Agents From Jack Smith’s Probe

The fallout has already begun from Republicans screaming bloody murder because Special Counsel Jack Smith investigated whether they were involved in subverting the 2020 election. To get ahead of the outrage machine, FBI Director Kash Patel took action against three FBI agents, including firing two of them, NBC News reports.

‘Come and Get Me’

Just another day in Trump’s America as he uses social media to threaten to jail Illinois’ governor and Chicago’s mayor:

Pritzker: “This is a convicted felon…who is threatening to jail me. This guy is unhinged. He's insecure. He's a wannabe dictator. And there's one thing I really want to say to Donald Trump: If you come for my people, you come through me. So come and get me.”

The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) 2025-10-08T17:48:47.449Z

Good Read

Greg Sargent: Inside Stephen Miller’s Secret Plan to Normalize Trump’s Dictator Rule

‘We Can’t Rule That Out’

After a crazy meeting at the White House in which Attorney General Pam Bondi said the administration was going to treat antifa the way it’s treated drug cartels, a sobering warning from Sen. Schiff (D-CA) on President Trump’s threat to domestic opposition groups:

Schiff: "You begin to wonder — do they believe they have the authority by putting some groups on a list, even domestic groups, to use lethal force against them, with no trial, no due process, no nothing? The reality is we can't rule that out."

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-09T01:04:18.501Z

Quote of the Day

“Despotism doesn’t impose itself on everyone all at once. It creeps inward from the margins of society.”–Brian Beutler

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!