WH Held Distressing Call With Governors As It Scrambled To Explain J&J News

A Premise Health healthcare worker loads a syringe with the COVID-19 Johnson&Johnson Janssen vaccine to vaccinate Toyota employees on March 26, 2021 in Buffalo, West Virginia. (Photo by Stephen Zenner/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

White House officials reportedly spent Tuesday morning on the phone with governors trying to explain federal health agencies’ sudden recommendation to pause Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine, which officials were given short notice of, according to CNN.

According to CNN, Biden administration officials leading the President’s vaccine effort found out at 10 p.m. Monday night that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were preparing an announcement regarding J&J’s COVID-19 vaccine. But because many lingering questions remained, White House officials didn’t immediately brief the President of the alarming news.

White House officials instead briefed Biden when the FDA and CDC released a joint recommendation on Tuesday morning advising health care providers to stop administering Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine “out of an abundance of caution,” following an FDA advisory reporting that six women in the U.S. developed a rare blood-clotting disorder that led to the death of one woman and put another in critical condition.

Amid their concerns about how the J&J news could potentially lower the public’s confidence in the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, White House officials found themselves fielding frustrations from governors during a midday group call on Tuesday.

In a recording of the group call obtained by CNN, state leaders expressed their dismay as federal health officials explained the pause on distributing J&J COVID-19 vaccines.

New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) grew increasingly frustrated as he pressed officials on whether there were other reasons behind the J&J news aside from the six documented cases of blood-clotting disorders in the country.

“Look, if I could just be frank for the sake of time — the questions we’re receiving over the last few hours on this are significant,” Sununu told the federal officials, according to CNN. “It’s very easy for a governor to pause, and of course we’ll do that if it’s a CDC and FDA recommendation, but it’s very hard as governors to go out and explain that we’re pausing based on something that is, as according to Dr. Fauci, a one-in-a-million occurrence.”

Sununu added that the ability of governors to reinstill confidence in vaccines after the J&J news makes it “100 times harder than the pause in the first place,” according to CNN.

Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts (R) expressed his impatience with the pause on the distribution of J&J’s vaccines, suggesting that officials need to work quickly to no longer put the vaccines on hold, especially in light of J&J providing the only single-dose vaccine on the market that has helped vaccinate rural communities more efficiently.

“Given the relatively low risk, I encourage you to take the pause back off as quickly as possible,” Ricketts urged, before suggesting that officials potentially place restrictions on certain gender and age groups instead, according to CNN.

During a briefing earlier Tuesday, acting FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock said that Biden administration officials wished they had more time to prepare the public for the J&J news.

“As we learned about the issue with appropriate treatment, it was clear to us that we needed to alert the public,” Woodcock said.

Shortly after the FDA and CDC held a press conference on its recommended pause of J&J vaccine distribution, several states moved to cease its distribution.

Earlier Tuesday, White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Jeff Zients said that federal health agencies’ recommendation to pause J&J’s COVID-19 vaccines wouldn’t impede the Biden administration’s vaccine rollout program.

“This announcement will not have a significant impact on our vaccination plan: Johnson & Johnson vaccine makes up less than 5 percent of the recorded shots in arms in the United States to date,” Zients said in a statement.

Although he didn’t address concerns about potential vaccine hesitancy following the J&J news, the President also dismissed the notion of the country not having enough vaccine supplies.

“There is enough vaccine that is basically 100% unquestionable, for every single solitary American,” Biden said, while insisting that US purchases of vaccines manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna are enough to continue the record-setting levels of vaccinations nationwide.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Is this a danger of blood clots forever, or for a limited time period after the vaccination? Is this something where blood thinners would offer protection?

  2. Some thoughts.

    First, LoL at GOP Govs now being pro-vaccine. After Trump’s statement today, J&J might get the ‘Maga Tough’ designation and be the preferred vaccine of choice!

    Second, what Sununu said here is not unreasonable. Based on Fauci’s comments they have their arms around the parameters of this as being similar to the AZ issue (though less frequent). Agree or disagree with the decision, it was technically possible for the CDC/FDA to quickly study the issue, alert the public that this was going under review, and then make a decision to either provide guidance or issue a pause after their meeting (if needed). The preemptive pause does damage the reputation of J&J and that does have an impact on vaccine hesitancy, whether folks want to acknowledge that or not.

    Third, Fauci and others hope that the selling point of the high standards of the CDC will help Americans trust the process more. I think that’s debatable.

    I think it’s going to be difficult for J&J to be viewed as an equally good vaccine to Pfizer and Moderna in the minds of the public, and the body language of the Biden Administration today was that they’re going to focus on Pfizer/Moderna to meet the targets. The good news is that based on the reactions of these GOP governors, a fair number of folks may be willing to absorb whatever risk there is and get the J&J because they like the ‘one and done’ aspect.

  3. What I heard on the radio was that the J&J shot produced a rare reaction in 6 women. So unless there is some way to figure out commonality of these 6 women do we need to give blood thinners to everyone willing to take the J&J shot?
    While I was getting my first Pfizer shot they asked me if I was on a blood thinner. Nope
    And because this is not one the mRNA vaccines that need to be kept in at a super cold temp do we know the shelf life of the J&J?

  4. currently looking for Tucky’s previous vaccine comments.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

100 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for cabchi Avatar for ajm Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for cervantes Avatar for voreason Avatar for zoester Avatar for inversion Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for lastroth Avatar for darcy Avatar for darrtown Avatar for maryq Avatar for jinnj Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for justruss Avatar for bloomingpeonie Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for gryka Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for osprey

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: