Walmart CEO Supports Debate Over Reinstating Assault Weapons Ban

ROGERS, AR - MAY 30: Doug McMillon, Walmart President and CEO speaks at the Walmart annual formal business and shareholders meeting on May 30, 2018 in Rogers, Arkansas. Walmart shareholders from around the world can ... ROGERS, AR - MAY 30: Doug McMillon, Walmart President and CEO speaks at the Walmart annual formal business and shareholders meeting on May 30, 2018 in Rogers, Arkansas. Walmart shareholders from around the world can attend meetings throughout the week. (Photo by Rick T. Wilking/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said on Thursday that he supports a debate over reauthorizing the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban after a series of mass shootings left more than 30 people dead earlier this month, including an incident at a Walmart store.

In an statement, McMillon said he and his company encourage moves to strengthen background checks and “remove weapons from those who have been determined to pose an imminent danger.”

“We do not sell military-style rifles, and we believe the reauthorization of the Assault Weapons ban should be debated to determine its effectiveness in keeping weapons made for war out of the 3 hands of mass murderers,” the CEO said.

Walmart, which currently sells hunting rifles, used to sell semi-automatic rifles up until 2015.

Under the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired in 2004 under the Bush administration, it was illegal to manufacture certain firearms and supplementary features that could make a firearm into a military-style weapon.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. He supports a debate on the topic… How cowardly. Particularly when Walmart customers have been slaughtered by these weapons.

  2. Talk is cheap. Walmart is cheap with its employees. And on and on it goes.

  3. A “Debate” to run out the clock on the issue so the next “Shiny Object” can distract the MSM.

  4. “We do not sell military-style rifles, and we believe the reauthorization of the Assault Weapons ban should be debated to determine its effectiveness in keeping weapons made for war out of the 3 hands of mass murderers,” the CEO said.

    I try not to nitpick typos but can’t resist here. if mass murderers had 3 hands it would be a lot easier to identify them and deny them permission to own firearms.

  5. “remove weapons from those who have been determined to pose an imminent danger.”

    Unfortunately, that determination is always made after-the-fact and will only stop the next killing spree when we put Peabody’s Wayback Machine into mass production. Until then, try something practical like limiting the capacity of magazines and having a serious discussion about what weapons should not be available to the general public because, in the words of Justice Scalia, “the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

36 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for ajm Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for cervantes Avatar for economides Avatar for kirkbross Avatar for denisj Avatar for icondaemon Avatar for tao Avatar for exspectator Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for benthere Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for tiowally Avatar for matx Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for nocomment Avatar for timorwig Avatar for katex Avatar for csurz420 Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Slocum

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: