Citing Impeachment, House Argues SCOTUS Should Not Shield Trump Tax Returns

UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 14: The U.S. Supreme Court building at sunset on Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House lawyers asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to reject President Trump’s efforts to keep congressional investigators from seeing his tax returns, noting that the financial records could factor into the “rapidly advancing impeachment inquiry,” the Los Angeles Times reported. 

The Supreme Court has before it two cases involving Trump’s financial records. One is his lawsuit seeking to block a House subpoena of his accounting firm, and the other is a challenge to a subpoena issued by state investigators in New York. Lower courts have backed the legality to the subpoenas in both cases. Trump’s personal attorneys have asked the Supreme Court to halt the enforcement of the subpoenas, setting the stage for a historic separation-of-powers battle if the high court does ultimately take the cases up on the merits.

The House’s filing on Thursday argued against Trump’s request that the Supreme Court put on pause an appeals court ruling upholding the House subpoena while the President formally appeals the case. If the Supreme Court does put on hold that ruling, then it should consider its next steps in an expedited fashion that would allow the case be heard this term, the House argued.

The filing laid out a proposed briefing schedule that would allow the justices to consider whether to take up the case at their Dec. 13 conference.

House Democrats’ lawyers argued that the fact that the House is engaged in an impeachment inquiry, the subpoenas for Trump’s tax returns have heightened significance and could play a role in how congressional investigators move forward with impeachment.

Read the filing below:

Latest News
34
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for Akimbo Akimbo says:

    I’m more apprehensive about SCOTUS weighing in on trump and the multitude of subpoenas and lawsuits than almost anything else. If SCOTUS aids in allowing the stalling to continue then this will all end up waiting for the election. It feels as though they are the last card Democracy has to play at this point.

  2. Lindsay Graham has tipped the Republican hand with the request for documents relating to Joe Biden’s dealings with Ukraine. If produced, State will have legitimized one request for information while denying others that stand to be potentially harmful to the administration.

    As for tax returns: these would fit neatly into the developing narrative that Trump had personal dealings that hinged on fabricating culpability that Ukraine factored into the disinformation campaign in the 2016 election. Those personal dealings: Russian money would tell that story. I believe that most people here would love to see that narrative unfold with newly revealed tax documents.

  3. I’m going to bet SCOTUS delays.

    Easy money.

  4. Avatar for Akimbo Akimbo says:

    Nah. State won’t have any problem handing over documents about Biden because trump won’t protest. trump’s protest was their sole reason for not turning them over last time.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

28 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for 1gg Avatar for cervantes Avatar for cometboy Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for jtx Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for filmknight Avatar for mtw Avatar for not2put2fine_a_point_on_it Avatar for Akimbo Avatar for WayOutWest

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: