SCOTUS Rules Immigrants Can Be Detained Years After Custody Release

WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES - 2018/08/23: The Supreme Court building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES - 2018/08/23: The Supreme Court building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday against a group of immigrants in a case about the government’s power to detain them after they’ve committed crimes but finished their sentences.

The issue in the case before the justices had to do with the detention of noncitizens who have committed a broad range of crimes that make them deportable. Immigration law tells the government to pick those people up when they are released from custody and then hold them while an immigration court decides whether they should be deported.

But those affected by the law aren’t always picked up immediately and are sometimes not detained until years later. In the case before the Supreme Court, a group of mostly green card holders argued that unless they’re picked up essentially within a day of being released, they should be entitled to a hearing where they can argue that they aren’t a danger to the community and are not likely to flee. If a judge were to agree, they would not have to remain in custody while their deportation case goes forward. That’s the same hearing rule that applies to other noncitizens the government is trying to deport.

But the Supreme Court disagreed with the immigrants’ interpretation of federal law in a 5-4 ruling that divided the court along ideological lines. Looking at a statutory provision enacted by Congress in 1996, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that “neither the statute’s text nor its structure” supported the immigrants’ argument. The court’s conservative justices sided with the Trump administration, which argued as the Obama administration did, against hearings for those convicted of crimes and affected by the law.

The case before the justices involved a class-action lawsuit brought by noncitizens in California and a similar class-action lawsuit brought in the state of Washington. One of the lead plaintiffs, Mony Preap, has been a lawful permanent resident of the United States since 1981 and has two convictions for possession of marijuana. He was released from prison in 2006 but was not taken into immigration custody until 2013.

Preap won in lower courts, and the government was ordered to provide him and other class members a bond hearing. Preap has since won his deportation case.

The case is 16-1363 Nielsen v. Preap.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Gee, I am so surprised by this decision… :smirk:

  2. That’s what we get for having a 100% aboriginal SCOTUS.

    No immigrant’s allowed!

  3. I like how TPM didn’t bother to put the 5-4 in there, we all knew that would be the case just from the headline…

  4. Avatar for nemo nemo says:

    Deeply unjust, unconscionable decision.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

11 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for nickdanger Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for epicurus Avatar for cervantes Avatar for sniffit Avatar for nemo Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for morrigan_2575 Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for birdford Avatar for icarrion Avatar for maximus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: