SCOTUS Rejects Arguments Kavanaugh Made As An Appeals Court Judge

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 08: U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh attends his ceremonial swearing in in the East Room of the White House October 08, 2018 in Washington, DC. Kavanaugh was confirmed in ... WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 08: U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh attends his ceremonial swearing in in the East Room of the White House October 08, 2018 in Washington, DC. Kavanaugh was confirmed in the Senate 50-48 after a contentious process that included several women accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Kavanaugh has denied the allegations. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is rejecting arguments made by Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was an appeals court judge in a case involving securities fraud.

The court’s 6-2 ruling Wednesday affirms an appeals court decision against investment banker Francis Lorenzo over false and misleading statements Lorenzo sent in emails to potential investors in a company. The emails described the company as having assets of $10 million when Lorenzo knew the real figure was $400,000.

Kavanaugh had dissented from the appellate ruling. He took no part in the high court case.

Justice Stephen Breyer’s majority opinion rejected Lorenzo’s argument that he did not violate Securities and Exchange Commission anti-fraud regulations because he merely sent the emails at the direction of his boss, who supplied the messages’ contents.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. “The emails described the company as having assets of $10 million when Lorenzo knew the real figure was $400,000.”

    Hasn’t drump done this like 1000 times, lie about his assets for various reasons, we even have documented proof of it, and yet why hasn’t he been charged?

  2. Makes one wonder if Trump knew about Kavanaugh’s previous arguments…

  3. Avatar for dont dont says:

    6 - 2. I’ve got 3, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch. Which one abandoned the coven?

  4. My bet is on Gorsuch

  5. to have to dissented means he’d have to had written his dissent in defense of Lorenzo??? Doesnt surprise me that kav is a “buyer beware” wanker…like in his defense of holding woman on the ground while being groped by him and his drunk fat buddies…it was the womans fault…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

40 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for epicurus Avatar for cervantes Avatar for mames5 Avatar for losamigos Avatar for dont Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for musgrove Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for gajake Avatar for dorwinblack Avatar for jtx Avatar for uneducated Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for spin Avatar for kelaine Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for 10c Avatar for zillacop Avatar for chjim Avatar for mhz

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: