States Trickle Out Of Trump Admin Private Partnership To Vaccinate Nursing Homes

WESTBOROUGH - DECEMBER 28: Olivia Siegel, CVS Pharmacist kept an eye on the temperature of the bag containing doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine at Beaumont Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center in Wes... WESTBOROUGH - DECEMBER 28: Olivia Siegel, CVS Pharmacist kept an eye on the temperature of the bag containing doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine at Beaumont Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center in Westborough, MA on Dec. 28, 2020. (Photo by Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) MORE LESS

At least two states are opting out of the federal partnership with pharmacies to distribute vaccines to nursing homes, one of the only areas in which the Trump administration used the power of the federal government to administer COVID-19 vaccines.

Florida and Oklahoma have moved over the past week from relying on a federal partnership with CVS and Walgreens to vaccinate the staff and residents of long-term care facilities to instead find other ways of finishing the inoculation program.

And, in both cases, top state officials blamed the chain pharmacies for going too slowly.

States around the country are complaining that federal supplies of COVID-19 vaccine aren’t nearly enough to meet demand, even among the relatively narrow categories of people for whom the shot is available.

But the federal pharmacy partnership — launched by the Trump administration in November 2020 — has gone slowly enough that, in some states, officials have indicated that the only doses outstanding are those being administered under the pharmacy program.

In Oklahoma, Deputy Heath Commissioner Keith Reed said that “The program is not moving as fast as we would like it to move.”

“If those are going to sit in a freezer and they’re not going to get to Oklahomans for several weeks down the road, we need to redirect that,” Reed said.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said that the state had decided to contract with another firm — CDR Health — because “time is of the essence.”

For states already facing budget crunches and understaffed public health departments due to the pandemic and a longstanding lack of funding, the decision to move away from the pharmacy partnership — which the federal government paid for — illustrates the frustration with the effort that has bubbled up around the country.

CVS and Walgreens, in separate comments to TPM, defended their performance. Both chains completed giving all recipients in long-term care facilities with which they were still contracted the first dose on Monday.

“Criticism that our long-term care vaccination program is slow or behind schedule in the state of Oklahoma is misinformed and not accurate,” CVS said in a statement.

The chain pharmacy added that last-minute fluctuations in the amount of vaccine allocated — a problem originating from the federal distribution network set up during the Trump administration — made it more difficult to plan how much vaccine should go to each long-term care facility.

A Walgreens spokesperson said that Oklahoma had “merely paused” in giving the company additional doses to use, and said that Florida had “re-allocated a small number of facilities contracted with Walgreens.”

“As the Governor mentioned yesterday, it is a team effort and we are proud to be part of the team,” the statement read.

Delays in the pharmacy partnership have caused consternation around the country, and fascination with the case of West Virginia, which eschewed the program in favor of using its own network of community pharmacies.

Thomas Dobbs, an official with the Mississippi Department of Health CHECK, told KHN that the program had been a “fiasco” in his state.

Other states have taken similar steps, albeit on a smaller scale or for different reasons. In Maine, state officials took 975 doses away from Walgreens and 500 from CVS.

In Pennsylvania, the state realized that it would need an additional contract to vaccinate other facilities that the federal plan didn’t cover.

It hired Rite-Aid to vaccinate long-term care facilities that didn’t fit into the plan, like psychiatric hospitals and group homes for people with disabilities.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: