LOS ANGELES (AP) — A man fired a rifle at two Los Angeles officers in a patrol car, but no one was injured in the attack that comes amid tension nationwide between police and protesters rallying against their tactics.
LAPD spokeswoman Officer Nuria Venegas said Monday that one man was under arrest and a second suspect was being sought in the Sunday night shooting in South Los Angeles, an area of the city ridden with gangs and crime and heavily patrolled by police.
The two officers were responding to a radio call and driving slowly in the neighborhood around 9:30 p.m. when they saw the muzzle flash of a rifle pointed in their direction, Venegas said. The officers returned fire, but no one was hit.
The officers arrested one suspect and recovered a rifle.
Police searched the neighborhood throughout the night for the second suspect, warning nearby residents to stay in their homes. The search of the immediate area was called off early Monday morning.
Police did not say why the search was called off or whether they had determined a motive for the shooting, which follows weeks of protests in California and across the country against police killings of unarmed black men in Missouri and New York.
The subsequent shooting of two New York City officers in their patrol car has departments proceeding with caution,police said.
“Obviously, with what happened in New York and what we know is the sentiment right now nationwide, in the mornings or in the evenings when you put on your uniform, you’re very much aware that there are some currents of anger toward police,” Detective Meghan Aguilar told KABC-TV. “We’re aware that we could be a target for individuals that are angry at law enforcement right now.”
The New York gunman ambushed the officers and then killed himself after posting threats online, including references to the fatal shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and the chokehold death of Eric Garner in New York City. Both were killed by white officers.
Deputy Chief Bob Green told KNBC-TV at the scene of the Los Angeles shooting that “based on what’s going on in the national picture, tensions are very high, that’s not what we need. Whether or not this is related to that — too early to tell.”
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
I see the LAPD released the man they had in custody and are now refering to him as “a person of interest.”
There doesn’t appear to be enough information to know if this is crazy nut, an anti-government nut or a revenge-against-the-police nut.
Seems like the only way to survive some armed conflicts with police, is to fire first. Self-inflicted wounds not withstanding.
The officers are “driving slowly in the neighborhood” when they see “the muzzle flash of a rifle pointed in their direction,” and yet neither they nor their cruiser is hit. Indeed, there is no report of the bullets landing anywhere near them.
Is it possible that this was simply an unrelated rifle discharge, rather than a man shooting at two Los Angeles officers in a patrol car? The cops have not said anything about hearing the shots impact in their vicinity – there is no statement in the manner of “We were taking fire.” In fact, the news reports begin with “Two men allegedly ambushed and fired several rounds at two LAPD officers Sunday night.”
I understand it is in the interest of the police right now to exaggerate every conceivable threat to their safety, as evidenced by the “massive manhunt conducted on the ground and by air” that lasted for nearly 10 hours after the arrest of an 18-year-old “person of interest,” but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. There are currently no reports that suggest that “person of interest” has admitted to firing at the LA cops.
If this was indeed an ambush, I am greatly relieved that no one was hurt. Right now it seems there is room for alternative explanations.
Are you kidding me?? Why the hell are you connecting this to the Garner protests? I expect this from Fox News but here, really??? There is literally, LITERALLY zero evidence you’ve provided to support that connection. What the hell do people have to do to get news from journalists who aren’t spamming propaganda for the police these days…?
When I was little I used to see bears when dad took me fishing.