In Response To Contempt Proceedings, DOJ Invites Nadler To Negotiation

on December 20, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 20: Ranking member Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), prepares to question Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen during a House Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, December 20, 2018 in Washingto... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 20: Ranking member Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), prepares to question Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen during a House Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, December 20, 2018 in Washington, DC. The committee heard testimony about oversight of the department. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Department of Justice is responding to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler opening contempt proceedings against Attorney General William Barr by inviting the chairman to a negotiation.

“We are prepared to discuss the matters raised in your letter, including your request to provide greater access to the less-redacted version of the report to additional Members of Congress and staff, as well as prioritizing review and possible disclosure of certain materials cited in the Special Counsel’s report, provided that such access and disclosure is done lawfully and in a manner that protects long-established Executive Branch confidentiality interests,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wote in a letter to Nadler Monday.

“To that end, we invite members of your and the Ranking Member’s staff to the Department on the afternoon of Wednesday, May 8, 2019 to negotiate an accommodation that meets the legitimate interests of our coequal branches of government,” he added.

Nadler began the process of charging Barr Monday morning when the attorney general missed a deadline to turn over an unredacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member on the Judiciary Committee, confirmed that he would be in attendance.

“The attorney general continues to offer accommodations to Chairman Nadler. After far exceeding what the regulations require and offering to field questions from Congress, the attorney general faces demands from Democrat leadership who refuse to read the information he’s offered,” Collins said in a statement. “I appreciate the respect Attorney General Barr is showing our committee by responding to a deluge of perverse demands. So far, he has honored Congress by being faithful to the laws we have enacted, and I look forward to a productive, bipartisan meeting this Wednesday.”

Read the response from the Department of Justice here:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Says Chairman Nadler:

  2. Avatar for bkmn bkmn says:

    It should not be subject to negotiation. Comply or start seeing people jailed and/or fined.

  3. Oh gosh, I sure hope someone here can explain to little ole me why this is all a disaster, horrible strategy, a huge corporatism-driven mistake and proof of failure that requires us to vote for some far left neophyte candidate in 2020, especially since Nadler hasn’t answered yet.

    Barr just blinked and Nadler is winning the game of chicken. He can meet with them and still issue the subpoena and/or contempt. The two are not mutually exclusive. Moreover, doing so provides him the leverage to negotiate. If they waste his fucking time at the negotiation, then it just adds to the evidence that enforcement of the subpoena is necessary.

  4. Sure it should. These things always are. If the branches are co-equal then it behooves them to accommodate each other with respect to legitimate legal and constitutional concerns that fall under their respective purviews. If this is just an attempt at bullshit, then so be it. It only adds to the evidence of bad faith and supports that a subpoena should be enforced.

  5. Negotiate about what? If it’s anything other than whether dis-Barr will voluntarily turn himself in or be arrested when the subpoena is enforced, Nadler should tell them to FO&D. There is nothing to negotiate.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

179 more replies

Participants

Avatar for kilgoretrout Avatar for maxwellsdemon Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for virginiavoter Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for emjayay Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for twowolves Avatar for schmed Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for georgeh Avatar for edhedh Avatar for jtx Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for lafe19 Avatar for kenga Avatar for outis Avatar for PaulsLaugh

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: