Republicans Crafting Way To Avoid Calling Bolton As A Witness

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 21: Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) (C) talks to reporters before heading into the weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol January 21, 2020 in Washington, DC. Senators will vo... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 21: Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) (C) talks to reporters before heading into the weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol January 21, 2020 in Washington, DC. Senators will vote Tuesday on the rules for President Donald Trump's impeachment trial, which is expected to last three to five weeks. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Ukraine bombshell revealed in former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s unpublished manuscript has made it more difficult for Republican senators to insist that additional witness testimony is unnecessary. 

The previously unreported episode, where President Donald Trump allegedly told Bolton that the withheld military aid was linked to investigations into Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, bolstered the already very good case that Bolton would be a witness with germane, first-hand knowledge of the pressure campaign. 

Now, Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) seems to be crafting an off-ramp from calling Bolton to testify for himself and his Republican peers. 

He proposed Tuesday that Bolton’s manuscript be given to the senators in a classified setting for individual review. He also urged Bolton to speak out publicly about his experiences — just not in the Senate. 

“I think getting that information first-hand would be really important for us,” Lankford said, per the Oklahoman. “My encouragement would be: If John Bolton’s got something to say, there’s plenty of microphones all over the country that he should step forward and start talking about it right now.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has already jumped aboard, saying that he “totally supports” Lankford’s proposal. 

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) told a Blaze reporter that it “might be helpful” to read the manuscript in private.

The proposal is a duplicitous way for Republicans to “support” hearing from Bolton without having to concede to calling witnesses. Most Republicans, led by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), have been staunchly against the idea of calling witnesses, who may present new and damaging information further implicating Trump. 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) immediately bashed the proposal.

“This is a book, there’s no need for it to be read in the SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility] unless you want to hide something!” he said at a press conference Tuesday.

Republicans have been reduced to arguing that inclusion of new evidence would drag the trial out, and, speciously, that it was the House’s job to call the witnesses.

At least a couple of GOP Senators seemed swayed in favor of calling witnesses Monday, after Bolton’s reveal went public.

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) said that it seems “increasingly likely” that other Republicans will want to hear from him.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said that she was already inclined to support calling witnesses, but that the Bolton news “strengthened the case” for their inclusion.

Latest News

Notable Replies


    They are so fucked and they know it.

    They either call him as a witness, or give up the senate, the house, and the White House in the next election.

    Enough Americans still value basic fairness to ensure that these dumb bastards are voted out.

  2. How will this satisfy the need to question the witness?
    Also, it’s hard to believe that Bolton and Trump were the only ones in the room. How will this satisfy the need to talk to those other people, as well?

  3. As long as they make the manuscript take an oath first, and then allow both parties to ask it questions.

  4. So in other words after 2 months of complaining about secret proceedings the Republicans are calling for…secret proceedings.

  5. And if Lankford got his way and Bolton stepped in front of that microphone and implicated Spanky these same repubs would be saying Bolton was lying because he was not under oath. What a bunch of two faced bastards.

Continue the discussion at

313 more replies


Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for lastroth Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for rickjones Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for nocomment Avatar for dougsanders Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for rucleare

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: