Police Urge Prosecutors To Go After Sinema Protesters

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 08: U.S. Sen. Kirsten Sinema (D-AZ) heads back to a bipartisan meeting on infrastructure in the basement of the U.S. Capitol building after the original talks fell through with the White House on June 8, 2021 in Washington, DC. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said they are now pursuing a two-path proposal that includes a new set of negotiations with a bipartisan group of senators. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Kirsten Sinema
Sen. Kirsten Sinema (D-AZ) heads back to a bipartisan meeting on infrastructure in the Capitol building on June 8, 2021. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Arizona State University Police Department has asked the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office to prosecute the immigration activists who filmed themselves confronting Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) at the school over her stonewalling of the sweeping reconciliation package, and following her into a bathroom as they did so several weeks ago.

ASU police spokesperson Adam Wolfe alleged in an interview with the Arizona Republic that the four protesters had committed misdemeanors of disorderly conduct and disrupting an educational institution.

The ASU police finished its investigation into the incident this past week, Wolfe told the Arizona Mirror.

The Arizona Republic and the Arizona Mirror noted that the police aren’t recommending criminal charges based on the state’s ban on recording a person in the bathroom. The protesters did not film Sinema inside the stall.

Wolfe told the Arizona Mirror that he would not publicly identify the protesters because his department’s recommendation is “still being processed” by the county attorney’s office, “and if they choose to prosecute I don’t want to interfere with that.”

The referral comes after immigration advocates from Living United for Change in Arizona (LUCHA) attempted to speak to Sinema outside a classroom where she was teaching on October 3. The senator ignored the activists, who were filming the confrontation, on her way to the bathroom as they asked her to support the reconciliation bill and include immigration reform in the legislation. (At this point, it is looking unlikely that immigration will make it into the bill — Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough rejected pro-immigration Democrats’ attempts to include it twice.)

Several of the protesters followed Sinema into the bathroom to keep trying to talk to her while filming.

Sinema released a statement the following day saying the confrontation was “not legitimate protest.”

“It is unacceptable for activist organizations to instruct their members to jeopardize themselves by engaging in unlawful activities such as gaining entry to closed university buildings, disrupting learning environments, and filming students in a restroom,” she said.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. They should flush them out

  2. Put Sinema under arrest for her fashion crimes, and to prevent similar crimes moving forward.

    Many universities consider themselves a marketplace of ideas. Sinema considers her own needs above the voters. Sinema could do better to let voters in her state know that they are heard. Squelching protest would be chilling free speech. Sinema could try to tamp down thoughts of prosecuting these Democrats. She will not oppose their prosecution. Unfortunatly, that is who she is.

  3. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    It is unacceptable for activist organizations to instruct their members to jeopardize themselves by engaging in unlawful activities such as gaining entry to closed university buildings, disrupting learning environments, and filming students in a restroom

    I wonder how these police feel about the Jan 6 uprising?

  4. Oh, don’t make my clutch my pearls!

  5. No way this gets prosecuted. They didn’t “disrupt an educational institution” and did not film Sinema on a toilet or state of undress. I think they crossed a line when they followed her in to the bathroom but no way you prosecute this trivial shit at the risk of chilling valid political protest and speech.

    No one should be fooled by this sham. It is about prosecuting dissent. Not criminal acts.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

61 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for sandi Avatar for ajm Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for rufustfirefly Avatar for epicurus Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for pastor_agnostic Avatar for tao Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for travelingprincess Avatar for hoagie Avatar for ted Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for corncaucus2008 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for maximus Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for chjim Avatar for JPIRiley Avatar for xcopy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: