NYT Declares Cotton’s Warlike Op-Ed Against Protests ‘Did Not Meet Our Standards’

Copies of the New York Times sit for sale in a rack July 23, 2008 in New York City. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The New York Times denounced on Thursday Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-AR) “Send In the Troops” op-ed that called on the military to crack down on nationwide unrest over the killing of George Floyd.

After critics (which included several of the Times’ own staffers) slammed the Times for giving a platform for a call to use military force on American citizens, Times spokesperson Eileen Murphy said in a statement that the paper had “examined the piece and the process leading up to its publication.”

“This review made clear that a rushed editorial process led to the publication of an Op-Ed that did not meet our standards,” she said. “As a result, we’re planning to examine both short-term and long-term changes, to include expanding our fact-checking operation and reducing the number of op-eds we publish.”

James Bennet, the editor who oversees the paper’s opinion section, told employees in a meeting that he hadn’t even read Cotton’s op-ed prior to publication, according to the Times’ report on the meeting.

In a Slack message to newsroom staffers that was also covered by the New York Times, A. G. Sulzberger, the Times’ publisher, seemed regretful of the “rushed editorial process” in publishing the column, which he said “did not meet our standards.”

“Given that this is not the first lapse, the Opinion department will also be taking several initial steps to reduce the likelihood of something like this happening again,” he wrote in the message.

Cotton delighted in the Times’ fiasco, tweeting he was “enjoying the @nytimes meltdown” and responding with a laughing emoji in response to a Slate report that his essay had caused the highest number of subscription cancels to the Times in a single hour.

The GOP senator’s office said in a statement that they had not been informed of the Times’ announcement in advance.

“We’re curious to know what part of that process and this piece didn’t meet their standards,” the office said.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. The NY Times
    Always regretting after the fact
    Always
    Cleanup on Aisle 3
    Why people are Turning to WaPO as the paper of record

  2. ‘Did Not Meet Our Standards’

    Could you publish your standards? Pretty sure we could help you identify some other opinion pieces, and some op-eds, that also fail to qualify.

  3. “This review made clear that a rushed editorial process led to the publication of an Op-Ed that did not meet our standards,” she said.

    So why in the hell is not one of your standards to abstain from rushing the editorial process?

    image

  4. LOL. I posted that when this piece was published the NYT would find a way to walk it back and sure enough-they have tried but it really is an epic fail.

  5. Shorter NYT: “It didn’t meet our standards but we published it anyway.”

    FAIL.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

171 more replies

Participants

Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for jw1 Avatar for meri Avatar for cervantes Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for danny Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for ted Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for thecaptain Avatar for pareedave Avatar for brian512 Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for gregor Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for redpill Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for ldcolton Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: