GOP Asks SCOTUS To Reinstate Tighter Ballot Deadlines In Critical Swing State

An absentee ballot election worker consolidates a large stack of absentee ballot applications at the Mecklenburg Board of Elections office in Charlotte, North Carolina on September 4, 2020. - The US election is offic... An absentee ballot election worker consolidates a large stack of absentee ballot applications at the Mecklenburg Board of Elections office in Charlotte, North Carolina on September 4, 2020. - The US election is officially open: North Carolina on September 4, 2020 launched vote-by-mail operations for the November 3 contest between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden, which is getting uglier by the day. Worries about the unabated spread of the coronavirus are expected to prompt a major increase in the number of ballots cast by mail, as Americans avoid polling stations. (Photo by Logan Cyrus / AFP) (Photo by LOGAN CYRUS/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
October 22, 2020 4:55 p.m.

Yet another election dispute in a potentially critical swing state has landed at the Supreme Court’s door step.

Republican legislative leaders, as well as the Trump campaign joined by the RNC, have asked that the Supreme Court to undo a six-day extension that the North Carolina State Board of Elections added to the state’s deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots.

The extension was a product of a consent decree the board agreed to in a lawsuit brought by voter advocacy groups. As part of the decree, the board also agreed to loosen up North Carolina’s witness requirement for absentee voting. The Republicans are asking the Supreme Court to block that accommodation for voters as well.

North Carolina is a swing state in the presidential election. It also has a very tight Senate race that could decide which party controls the upper chamber next year.

Get TPM in your inbox, twice weekly.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

In previous elections, Black voters have made up a disproportionate number of those whose mail ballots were rejected, a recent ProPublica report found, while pointing specifically to the state’s witness requirement. Already, data from the 2020 general election has shown that Black voters are more likely to turn in mail ballots with deficiencies that white voters, even though they make a smaller portion of absentee voters so far, according to the ProPublica report.

Under the guidance from the board of elections that is now being challenged at the Supreme Court, when election officials receive ballots with missing witness information, they can reach out to the voter and have them sign a declaration that certifies the voter’s identity instead.

Beyond the impact the dispute stands to have on North Carolina voters, it will also give the Supreme Court another chance to weigh in on a controversial argument Republicans have been pushing to reverse accommodations granted to voters for the pandemic.

In this case, as well as in a dispute previously before the U.S. Supreme Court coming out of Pennsylvania, the Republicans are arguing that the looser rules are a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, because they were put into place by an entity other than a state legislature.

In the Pennsylvania case, the entity was the state Supreme Court, which had extended the receipt deadline for mail ballots by three days. With Chief Justice John Roberts joining the three liberal justices, the U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on the dispute, which allowed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling to stand for now. Neither side provided an explanation for why they voted the way did.

It’s unclear whether Roberts would swing towards the liberals in this case as well, since it’s a state board decision — rather than a ruling from a state Supreme Court — that the Republicans are now asking the justices to disturb.

(Like in the Pennsylvania dispute, a 4-4 decision would have the effect of leaving in place a federal appeals court decision upholding the North Carolina Election Board’s consent decree).

Another unknown is how a newly seated Justice Amy Coney Barrett would respond to the Republicans’ arguments about the Elections Clause. She is slated to be confirmed to the Supreme Court by the Senate early next week.

Roberts, who received the North Carolina requests because he has oversight of the Circuit containing the state, has asked for responses to the Republican requests by 3 p.m. Saturday.

Latest News
Comments are now Members-Only

Non-members are still able to read comments, but will no longer be able to participate. To join the conversation, sign up now and get:

30% Off Annual Prime Membership

TPM strives to build as inclusive a community as financially possible. We offer FREE memberships to those experiencing financial hardship and FREE memberships for students.

View all options
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Audience Development Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: