GOP Asks SCOTUS To Reinstate Tighter Ballot Deadlines In Critical Swing State

An absentee ballot election worker consolidates a large stack of absentee ballot applications at the Mecklenburg Board of Elections office in Charlotte, North Carolina on September 4, 2020. - The US election is offic... An absentee ballot election worker consolidates a large stack of absentee ballot applications at the Mecklenburg Board of Elections office in Charlotte, North Carolina on September 4, 2020. - The US election is officially open: North Carolina on September 4, 2020 launched vote-by-mail operations for the November 3 contest between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden, which is getting uglier by the day. Worries about the unabated spread of the coronavirus are expected to prompt a major increase in the number of ballots cast by mail, as Americans avoid polling stations. (Photo by Logan Cyrus / AFP) (Photo by LOGAN CYRUS/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS

Yet another election dispute in a potentially critical swing state has landed at the Supreme Court’s door step.

Republican legislative leaders, as well as the Trump campaign joined by the RNC, have asked that the Supreme Court to undo a six-day extension that the North Carolina State Board of Elections added to the state’s deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots.

The extension was a product of a consent decree the board agreed to in a lawsuit brought by voter advocacy groups. As part of the decree, the board also agreed to loosen up North Carolina’s witness requirement for absentee voting. The Republicans are asking the Supreme Court to block that accommodation for voters as well.

North Carolina is a swing state in the presidential election. It also has a very tight Senate race that could decide which party controls the upper chamber next year.

In previous elections, Black voters have made up a disproportionate number of those whose mail ballots were rejected, a recent ProPublica report found, while pointing specifically to the state’s witness requirement. Already, data from the 2020 general election has shown that Black voters are more likely to turn in mail ballots with deficiencies that white voters, even though they make a smaller portion of absentee voters so far, according to the ProPublica report.

Under the guidance from the board of elections that is now being challenged at the Supreme Court, when election officials receive ballots with missing witness information, they can reach out to the voter and have them sign a declaration that certifies the voter’s identity instead.

Beyond the impact the dispute stands to have on North Carolina voters, it will also give the Supreme Court another chance to weigh in on a controversial argument Republicans have been pushing to reverse accommodations granted to voters for the pandemic.

In this case, as well as in a dispute previously before the U.S. Supreme Court coming out of Pennsylvania, the Republicans are arguing that the looser rules are a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, because they were put into place by an entity other than a state legislature.

In the Pennsylvania case, the entity was the state Supreme Court, which had extended the receipt deadline for mail ballots by three days. With Chief Justice John Roberts joining the three liberal justices, the U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on the dispute, which allowed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling to stand for now. Neither side provided an explanation for why they voted the way did.

It’s unclear whether Roberts would swing towards the liberals in this case as well, since it’s a state board decision — rather than a ruling from a state Supreme Court — that the Republicans are now asking the justices to disturb.

(Like in the Pennsylvania dispute, a 4-4 decision would have the effect of leaving in place a federal appeals court decision upholding the North Carolina Election Board’s consent decree).

Another unknown is how a newly seated Justice Amy Coney Barrett would respond to the Republicans’ arguments about the Elections Clause. She is slated to be confirmed to the Supreme Court by the Senate early next week.

Roberts, who received the North Carolina requests because he has oversight of the Circuit containing the state, has asked for responses to the Republican requests by 3 p.m. Saturday.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriter:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: