New Zealand Citizens Open To Gun Reform After Massacre

Ian Britton walks into a gun shop in Christchurch, New Zealand, Sunday, March 17, 2019. Gun ownership in New Zealand is being discussed after a mass shooting at two area mosques. (AP Photo/Mark Baker)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand (AP) — The New Zealand leader’s promise of tightened gun laws in the wake of the Christchurch mosque shootings has been widely welcomed by a stunned population.

Prime Minister Jacinta Ardern said her Cabinet will consider the details of the changes on Monday. She has said options include a ban on private ownership of semi-automatic rifles that were used with devastating effect in Christchurch and a government-funded buyback of newly outlawed guns.

While curtailing gun owners’ rights is a political battleground in the United States, Christchurch gun owner Max Roberts, 22, predicted Ardern won’t face serious opposition to her agenda.

“There will be no opposition to it. There’s no movement in New Zealand for that. Our media and politics are more left wing,” said Roberts, a carpenter who uses guns for hunting.

Elliot Dawson, who survived the shooting at Christchurch’s Linwood mosque by hiding in a bathroom, hopes New Zealand follows Australia’s lead on gun control.

In Australia, a virtual ban on private ownership of semi-automatic rifles and a government-funded gun buyback cut the size of the country’s civilian arsenal by almost a third.

The ban followed a 1996 massacre in which a lone gunman used assault rifles to kill 35 people in Tasmania state in 1996.

“Personally, I don’t think guns should be legal at all. Maybe in some extreme self-defense, but I don’t think they need such firearms like that,” Dawson said. “New Zealand is not America. America is a totally different situation. I think in America it would be probably more dangerous to take people’s guns away. But here, I don’t think we need them at all.”

Akshesh Sharma moved to Christchurch from Fiji to study. He was shocked that the shooter was able to get his hands on such military-style weapons.

Sharma agrees with the prime minister that gun laws need to be tightened.

“I don’t see this as a place where you need guns to live to feel safe,” Sharma said. “I can understand in the U.S. maybe, but here it’s a different story.”

Roberts, the gun owner, doubted banning certain types of weapons would be effective. But he said New Zealand should only allow its own citizens to buy guns. Brenton Harrison Tarrant, the Australian charged in the Christchurch shootings, obtained a New Zealand gun license in November 2017 and started legally amassing an arsenal of five guns within a month.

“I think when people harbor hate like, that these things are possible,” Roberts said.

“Particularly Australian citizens, I don’t understand how they can get access to firearms in New Zealand when New Zealand citizens can’t get access to firearms in Australia,” he added.

Ian Britton uses a rifle for shooting rabbits and target shooting. He favors outlawing assault rifles like those used in Christchurch because they’re unnecessary.

“I can’t use the words I’d like to use, but it’s disgusting. I never thought I’d see that in this country,” Britton said.

Ardern noted that attempts to reform had failed before under pressure from the gun lobby.

“There have been attempts to change our laws in 2005, 2012 and after an inquiry in 2017. Now is the time for change,” she said.

___

Associated Press writer Rod McGuirk in Canberra, Australia, contributed to this report.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Ardern noted that attempts to reform had failed before under pressure from the gun lobby.

    So does the NRA have an international branch? Do they have a go team that will jump into action at the sound of “gun reform” anywhere in the white world?

  2. I don’t see this as a place where you need guns to live to feel safe,” Sharma said. “I can understand in the U.S. maybe, but here it’s a different story.

    It actually isn’t different in the U.S. The notion that you’re in greater danger of being the target of a violent crime in the U.S. is a myth, with one notable exception: because the place is awash in firearms, your chances of being the victim of a gunshot are higher. But most of those tragedies are accidents, family disputes that get out of hand, and suicides. So, people think they need the guns to defend them from the guns - which isn’t true.

  3. Avatar for tsp tsp says:

    Hint: Russia!

  4. In Australia, a virtual ban on private ownership of semi-automatic rifles and a government-funded gun buyback cut the size of the country’s civilian arsenal by almost a third.

    The ban followed a 1996 massacre in which a lone gunman used assault rifles to kill 35 people in Tasmania state in 1996.

  5. Surprisingly permissive laws. There may be an exception if you’re provably a resident who wants to hunt and has a permit, but for the most part non-citizens can’t buy guns here at all.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

25 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for redacted Avatar for inversion Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for tsp Avatar for rickjones Avatar for castor_troy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: