NH GOPer On Pearl-Wearing: ‘The Anti-Gun Folks Need To Get Over Themselves’

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. John Burt, a Republican who sits on the New Hampshire House Committee on Public Safety, had dismissive words for the Moms Demand Action volunteers who were insulted Tuesday by his peers’ decision to don pearls during a hearing on a gun safety measure.

“The anti-gun out-of-state lady and the other anti-gun folks need to get over themselves,” Burt told TPM in an email, referring to Moms Demand Action founder Shannon Watts. “This had nothing to do with them. It is to support the Women’s Defense League and the good they do to train women to protect their children.”

The Women’s Defense League, according to its Twitter page, is a group that “provides women opportunities to learn practical self-defense skills and defends Second Amendment rights.”

“Who does not want to protect their children?” Burt continued. “O ya, some anti-gun folks do not.”

Burt said that he was not wearing the pearls Tuesday because he forgot his, but that he’s “worn them in the past” and “would have had them on” had he remembered.

“They are to support the WDL. That is it,” he added. “The anti-gunners need to get over themselves. Sorry they were not the reason we had them on.”

Watts, who was present at the hearing, was told that the pearls symbolized either “pearl-clutching” or a callback to an old story about a fight between a gun-control activist and a pearl-wearing NRA member.

“Many of our volunteers were disgusted,” Watts told TPM on Tuesday. “Some of them are gun violence survivors who were giving testimony.”

Identifiable in pictures as wearing the pearls are Republican Reps. Daryl Abbas, Scott Wallace and David Welch. None of the three responded to requests for comment.

The stunt drew the ire of state Rep. Debra Altschiller (D), the sponsor of the legislation that was being discussed at the meeting. The bill would establish a process for emergency risk protection orders, known as “red flag laws,” that suspend gun rights if a person is deemed to be a risk.

The episode also garnered attention from some 2020 Democratic contenders.

Latest News
38
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Anti-gun folks? What about the anti-pearl folks?

  2. So Rep. John Burt, the bigly supporter of WDL, what’s in their program to defend women and children from a gun wielding spouse or father? You should know this, this is your group you’re defending.

  3. Classic GOP political stunt and gaslighting.

  4. Can’t we just pretend they’re making fun of Sarah Huckafuck Sanders? If anyone is devoted to her pearls, it’s that lying bitch. These woman that are fighting against gun violence don’t deserve this shit and everyone with an ounce of common decency knows that. SHS, on the other hand…feel free. Totally appropriate to go after someone like her, that lies to the American public on a daily basis while taking taxpayer money to do it. Her pearls are fair game.

  5. And passive aggression with the pearl thing.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

32 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lionel_hutz Avatar for fgs Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for theod Avatar for dark_hawk_98 Avatar for wanderer Avatar for tacoma Avatar for phillydave Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for lastroth Avatar for mcstubbins Avatar for mtblaze Avatar for mrf Avatar for chicago11 Avatar for maricaibo Avatar for warrenzevon Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for ceenik Avatar for maximus Avatar for georgial1beral Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for theshadowknows Avatar for mesinnyc

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: