House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said Sunday that he could call special counsel Robert Mueller before the committee to testify “if necessary, but that’s a very big ‘if.'”
In an interview with NBC News’ Chuck Todd, Nadler said Mueller “speaks through [the] report” that he concluded Friday, and that “if that report answers all our questions, there will be no need to call him.”
He added: “If that report is not public, if large parts of it are not made public, or if it leaves a lot of questions, then we’d have a necessity to call him.”
“You don’t call witnesses unnecessarily,” Nadler said.
WATCH: Should the House call Robert Mueller to testify about the findings of his report to the Attorney General? #MTP #IfItsSunday@RepJerryNadler: "He speaks through through that report. If that report answers all our questions, there will be no need to call him." pic.twitter.com/rbjiWtR7mk
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) March 24, 2019
Great, Jerry. The first one should be: Since we all heard the Moron tell Lester Holt that Comey’s firing should get rid of the “Russia thing,” doesn’t that constitute obstruction of justice?
If his report answers all our questions, and we get to see it (all of it).
Yeah, I thought that was an obvious “Duh!” myself.
It might be fair to observe that the condition is presumed in his comment, but I wanted to say it out loud anyway. (If they hold back substantive parts of the report, it probably will not answer all our questions. If nothing else, it would open the question “where is the rest of it?”)
Has the motherfucker resigned yet?
Asking for Lady Liberty and 62,999,999 other friends.