Montana GOPer Proposes State Give ‘Small Token’ Of $8M For Trump’s Wall

FILE - In this Nov. 14, 2018 file photo Senate President Scott Sales, R-Bozeman, addresses the Senate Republican caucus at the State Capitol in Helena, Mont. Montana's Senate president is proposing the state give mor... FILE - In this Nov. 14, 2018 file photo Senate President Scott Sales, R-Bozeman, addresses the Senate Republican caucus at the State Capitol in Helena, Mont. Montana's Senate president is proposing the state give more than $8 million to help build President Donald Trump's proposed wall on the Mexican border. Sales, a Republican, says his proposal is a "small token" to show border security "is of vital interest to all citizens regardless of what state they live in." (Thom Bridge/Independent Record via AP, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

HELENA, Mont. (AP) — A Montana politician is proposing the state give more than $8 million to help build President Donald Trump’s proposed wall on the Mexican border as a government shutdown over the $5.7 billion project continues. The proposal seems unlikely to pass in a state with a Democratic governor exploring a run for president.

At least one other state, South Dakota, is considering voicing support for Trump’s wall. But Montana, which last year faced a massive budget shortfall, appears to be the first to propose spending its own money on the project.

Scott Sales, a fiscally conservative Republican who leads the state Senate, says his proposal is a “small token” to show border security “is of vital interest to all citizens regardless of what state they live in.”

Trump headed to the U.S.-Mexico border Thursday to argue his case for the funding.

“Congress is basically dragging their heels over $5 billion, which is really trivial compared to what we spend on an annual basis,” Sales said Wednesday.

Sales said he calculated Montana’s “share” of the cost of the wall by dividing the state’s gross domestic product by the national GDP and multiplying it by $5.7 billion.

Montana’s $8 million wouldn’t go very far, with Trump’s $5.7B request expected to build 234 miles (377 kilometers).

House Minority Leader Casey Schreiner, a Democrat, said the Legislature should focus on building Montana’s infrastructure.

“That’s a lot of school roofs and boilers,” added Democratic Rep. Laurie Bishop.

Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock, who appears to be exploring a run for president in 2020, could veto the measure should it pass the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Montana, where Trump defeated Hillary Clinton by 20 points, shares a 545-mile (877-kilometer) border with Canada, where there is no wall.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    They say there’s a sucker state admitted to the union every minute.

  2. Stupid is as stupid does…

  3. Good Lord! Shouldn’t they be more concerned about all the Toronto-13 members streaming across our unprotected northern border? Priorities, people!

  4. A Montana politician is proposing the state give more than $8 million
    I wonder if he has ever traveled south of the Mason Dixon Line.
    He better watch his back door because trumps next wall attempt will pass across his state.
    terrorists and brown people sneaking in from Canada continuously . Don’t ya know?

  5. Scott Sales, a fiscally conservative Republican

    I’ll just leave this here.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

45 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for dv01 Avatar for headhunter212 Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for progress Avatar for murgatroid Avatar for tao Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for taylorbad Avatar for mrf Avatar for katwillow Avatar for reggid Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for tiowally Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for maximus Avatar for dominic Avatar for zillacop Avatar for occamscoin

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: