Mike Flynn Case Gets Even Weirder: Judge Considers Criminal Contempt

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 18: Former White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn leaves the Prettyman Federal Courthouse following a sentencing hearing in U.S. District Court December 18, 2018 in Washington, ... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 18: Former White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn leaves the Prettyman Federal Courthouse following a sentencing hearing in U.S. District Court December 18, 2018 in Washington, DC. Flynn's lawyers accepted the judge's offer to delay sentencing for lying to the FBI about his communication with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller has recommended no prison time for Flynn due to his cooperation with the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The judge overseeing Michael Flynn’s case took the extraordinary step of appointing a retired judge to brief him on whether Flynn should be held in contempt of court.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan announced Wednesday the appointment of retired U.S. District Judge John Gleeson less than a week after the Justice Department announced that it was seeking to drop its case against Flynn.

Gleeson was appointed to the federal bench in the Eastern District of New York by President Bill Clinton. Earlier in his career, Gleeson was a federal prosecutor and won the conviction of the Teflon Don, John Gotti, in the 1980s.

Sullivan’s order said that Gleeson would be briefing him on whether the judge should issue an order to show cause as to why Flynn should not be held in “criminal contempt for perjury,” while citing both federal law and rules of procedure that allow for criminal contempt sanctions for misconduct in court.

Sullivan’s order did not specify what allegation of perjury he was referring to. However, Flynn twice admitted in court to lying to the FBI — including in December 2018, after Sullivan put him under oath.

Last year, Flynn sought to withdraw that plea while asking the judge to throw out the prosecution against him. Amid immense pressure from President Trump and his allies, the Justice Department announced last week that it was moving to dismiss Flynn’s case because it no longer believed the investigation that prompted the FBI to interview him was warranted.

Read the order below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. There is hope for justice and our country yet!! See Supreme Court, this is how patriots act, not pretending that exposing Dotard’s many crimes Is a burden on the toddler.

  2. Guess the judge thinks it was material…

  3. But … the unmasking!

  4. It has always been the judicial branch that has dragged our country forward, if sometimes late, and often kicking and screaming the whole time.

  5. Oh, what a tangled web we weave…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

251 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for cervantes Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for dryheat Avatar for pshah Avatar for blaneyboy324 Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for brian512 Avatar for spin Avatar for bcgister Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for progressiveandsane Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for filmknight Avatar for dicktater Avatar for rucleare Avatar for visionseeker Avatar for kovie Avatar for Akimbo Avatar for mys_lys

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: