Meadows Is Now Engaging With Jan. 6 Committee After Initial Defiance

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 13: White House chief of staff Mark Meadows attends the second day of the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Capitol Hill on ... WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 13: White House chief of staff Mark Meadows attends the second day of the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Capitol Hill on October 13, 2020 in Washington, DC. Barrett was nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who passed away in September. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows on Tuesday has begun engaging with the Jan. 6 select committee through his attorney after initially defying the panel’s subpoena, which the panel warned could land him a referral for criminal contempt if he didn’t comply this week.

Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) confirmed Meadows’ engagement with the committee through his attorney, George Terwilliger, in a statement. Thompson said that Meadows’ attorney has provided records to the committee and that Meadows will soon appear for an initial deposition.

“The Select Committee expects all witnesses, including Mr. Meadows, to provide all information requested and that the Select Committee is lawfully entitled to receive,” Thompson said. “The Committee will continue to assess his degree of compliance with our subpoena after the deposition.”

Terwilliger told CNN that both parties have come to an understanding about how to proceed with exchanging information. Terwilliger said that his client and the committee are willing to engage on a certain set of topics as they navigate how to respond to requests that could potentially fall under executive privilege.

However, it is unclear whether the two sides will come to a consensus on what is considered privileged information. Trump’s lawyers have been arguing in court for months that the former president should be able to assert executive privilege over records from the committee. Trump’s lawyers took those arguments to a federal appeals court Tuesday after losing in district court earlier this month.

“As we have from the beginning, we continue to work with the Select Committee and its staff to see if we can reach an accommodation that does not require Mr. Meadows to waive Executive Privilege or to forfeit the long-standing position that senior White House aides cannot be compelled to testify before Congress,” Terwilliger told CNN. “We appreciate the Select Committee’s openness to receiving voluntary responses on non-privileged topics.”

Meadows’ engagement with the committee comes just days after member Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) suggested that the panel plans to take action against Meadows this week if he continues to defy the panel’s subpoena.

Earlier this month, Meadows refused to meet with congressional investigators. On Sunday, Schiff said that the committee will likely make a decision this week about taking action against witnesses who have defied its subpoenas.

Meadows’ engagement also comes weeks after Trump adviser Steve Bannon was charged with two counts of contempt of Congress for failing to testify and turn over documents in response to a subpoena from the committee. The committee will also vote Wednesday recommending the full House vote to refer former Trump Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark to the DOJ for criminal contempt.

Latest News
106
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. As long as they only ask the former Cheap of Staph about statements of fact, there is no non-privileged information to hold back.

  2. As expected, some of the Trump minions will fold under the pressure of a contempt conviction, and all the legal expenses of fighting it. Meadows may still try to hold some stuff back, especially since he appears to be a key connection between some of the parties…he may also do the smart thing and make a deal, as the first person to make a deal usually gets the best one.

    It’s going to be very interesting when the committee starts putting out reports and holding public hearings, they are working through people and will get to the bottom of what happened, and anyone that refuses to work with them is going to find themselves in very hot water, as the committee will have the story of what they did and make it clear why they refused to cooperate. DoJ is going to take that and build a legal case, and some of these people will go to prison as a result. And a good thing, having any administration attempt to hold office after losing an election has to be smacked down hard, otherwise we won’t be a democracy for too much longer.

  3. He might be engaging, but he wont talk at all. If cornered he will plead the Fifth, there were all kinds of crimes committed and he was in the thick of it.

  4. Of course Marky Mark had to make big noises and emit his manly musk…but I knew he couldn’t keep it up.

    I figured it was time for him to capitulate…of course, he will plead the fifth…but I think he will appear.

  5. “We appreciate the Select Committee’s openness to receiving voluntary responses on non-privileged topics.”

    We appreciate the Select Committee accepting only the answers we want to give to question we want asked.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

100 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for punaise Avatar for douglashh Avatar for globalguy Avatar for theod Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for inversion Avatar for dont Avatar for lastroth Avatar for donnyyoung Avatar for billymac Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for phlogiston Avatar for sin_nombre_hombre Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for madassyrian

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: